0
Some historians consider the bloodshed over slavery in Kansas as the first battles of .?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
(the Civial War)
Janet Torp
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did bleeding kansas contribute to the war?
It demonstrated that the slavery argument would never be resolved except by bloodshed.
What was the longterm effect of the bleeding kansas problem?
It was proof that the slavery debate would never be settled except through bloodshed.
What happened in Kansas that caused the civil war?
The attempt to put the slavery question to the vote. It caused intimidation and bloodshed, foreshadowing the war.
True false Historians agree that it is superficial to attribute the causes of the Civil War to slavery?
True. Slavery had very little or nothing to do with the reasons for the American civil war.
Did bleeding Nebraskabecome the scene of a territorial civil war between pro-slavery and antislavery settlers?
No. That was Kansas. After allthe bloodshed, they didn't try thePopular Sovereigntyvote with Nebraska. And by the time that state joined the Union, slavery had been abolished throughout the USA.
Some historians consider the bloodshed over slavery in Kansas as the first battles of?
(the Civial War)
Some history considered the bloodshed over slavery in kansas as the first battles of?
American Civil War
Which territory had to have federal troops sent in to stop violence and bloodshed over slavery in 1856?
Kansas
How did bleeding kansas contribute to the war?
It demonstrated that the slavery argument would never be resolved except by bloodshed.
How would slavery be decided in the Kansas-Nebraska Act?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 allowed settlers in those territories to decide the issue of slavery through popular sovereignty, meaning the residents could vote on whether to allow slavery within their borders. This effectively repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which had banned slavery in territories north of a certain latitude. The act led to violent clashes between pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers, intensifying tensions over the issue of slavery in the United States.
What was the longterm effect of the bleeding kansas problem?
It was proof that the slavery debate would never be settled except through bloodshed.
What happened in Kansas that caused the civil war?
The attempt to put the slavery question to the vote. It caused intimidation and bloodshed, foreshadowing the war.
How did the kansas - nebraska act propose to deal with the issue of slavery?
By local vote (or 'Popular Sovereignty') This sounded like a reasonable and peaceful solution, but it led to bloodshed, with terrorists intimidating the voters, and it generally raised the heat of the whole slavery debate.
True false Historians agree that it is superficial to attribute the causes of the Civil War to slavery?
True. Slavery had very little or nothing to do with the reasons for the American civil war.
What were some of the factors people had to consider as they thought about escaping from slavery?
Escaping from slavery involved careful planning, as individuals had to consider factors such as timing, route, resources, and potential dangers along the way. They also had to weigh the risks of being caught against the desire for freedom, making strategic decisions about when and how to make their escape. Additionally, they had to be aware of laws and policies that prohibited their movement and could impact their chances of success.
Did bleeding Nebraskabecome the scene of a territorial civil war between pro-slavery and antislavery settlers?
No. That was Kansas. After allthe bloodshed, they didn't try thePopular Sovereigntyvote with Nebraska. And by the time that state joined the Union, slavery had been abolished throughout the USA.
Were slaves bought from Zimbabwe specifically?
Zimbabwe does not have a history of slavery Well if you consider human trafficking a form of slavery then actually there is a form of slavery that exists today.
