0
Suppose the scientist had put one type of gravy in the flask he left open and another in the flask he sealed would this be a well-designed controlled experiment?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Yes, because you'll find out if all gravy has the same reaction.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Will astronauts disover more planets?
I would suppose that the scientist with the super powered telescopes would discover planets before the astronauts would.
Why is it important for scientists to be objective?
If scientists are not objective, they will not be able to interpret the information they discover correctly.Let's try an example. Suppose a scientist was convinced that a chemical he invented would be harder than a diamond. If he was an objective scientist, he would test the chemical and be honest about whatever results he found. If he was not objective, he would interpret any information as proof that the chemical was harder than a diamond - or he would say that something went wrong in the experiment if it didn't prove that.
Suppose you are operating a remote controlled spacecraft on Mars from a station here on Earth. How long will it take the craft to respond to your command if Mars is at its nearest point to the Earth?
First you must figure out how close Mars can get to the earth.
When you change from medium to high power what part of the microscope are you not suppose to touch?
on the high power what are you not suppose to touch
Example of control group?
The control group is the one that is not manipulated in any way. Suppose we are testing the effect of studying on test scores. The group that did not study would be the control group. The group that did study would be the experimental group.
After scientist make a hypothesis they perform a?
Answer According to the scientific method, scientists perform an experiment. Answer I suppose you could say scientists perform an experiment next, but that is skipping some crucial points. How can you perform an experiment when all you have are ideas? Before you test out your hypothesis, you need to gather materials and draw up your procedure. Scientists just don't jump into something; they need a step-by-step plan of how they will carry out their test. In addition, they will also make predictions given their hypothesis. They need to know what result(s) will support or falsify the initial hypothesis.
Would it be considered a science experiment if you tried to fly?
Yes, I suppose you could call that a science experiment.
What type of scientist studies biotic factors?
I would describe such a scientist as an environmental scientist.
Is it possible to observe a reference in a science experiment?
Why would you ask something like this!!! ,but yeah i suppose.....
How might the sources that are the results of human activities be controlled?
I suppose the answer must be by control of human activities
How do you design an experiment to find out what happens when a carbonate is added to some dilute acid?
you are suppose to start with your success criteria
What experiment would tell you if water takes stuff with it when it evaporates?
I suppose that the chemical analysys of the condensed water can offer information.
What is the control condition?
While conducting an experiment, it is important to have a experimental control. Suppose you are conducting an experiment to determine what factors affect the rate of evaporation of water. If you want to determine if presence of wind affects evaporation, you can take two containers of water and place one in a windy place and the other in a place with no wind. However all other factors should be identical like surface area of containers, surrounding temperature, liquid quantity and temperature etc. Hence, the need for a controlled experiment is to eliminate bias and to ensure that the data is valid.
Will astronauts disover more planets?
I would suppose that the scientist with the super powered telescopes would discover planets before the astronauts would.
Why is it important for scientists to be objective?
If scientists are not objective, they will not be able to interpret the information they discover correctly.Let's try an example. Suppose a scientist was convinced that a chemical he invented would be harder than a diamond. If he was an objective scientist, he would test the chemical and be honest about whatever results he found. If he was not objective, he would interpret any information as proof that the chemical was harder than a diamond - or he would say that something went wrong in the experiment if it didn't prove that.
At what temp Is the elect fan on a 96 Cherokee controlled by a sensor through a relay in the PCM I think suppose to turn on?
212 degrees F, I think
Does a Neutrino affected by Gravity?
Yes. I suppose it would be hard to verify through experiment, but there is no specific reason why it shouldn't - basically, it has mass. Even light is affected by gravity.
