answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

own plows

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1d ago

have more control over their farming operations and keep a larger portion of their harvest to themselves.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

Own plows-apex

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Sociology

Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to what?

own plows


Why Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to?

Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to have more control over their land and crops, as they paid cash rent and had more freedom to choose what to plant. Tenant farmers were also more independent in managing their own expenses and reaping the profits from their harvests. Sharecroppers, on the other hand, typically had less control over their farming operations and often operated under more restrictive agreements with landowners.


What was the difference between tenant farmers and sharecroppers?

Tenant farmers rented land and paid a fixed rent to the landowner, while sharecroppers did not pay rent but instead received a portion of the crops they grew as payment. Sharecroppers typically had less control over their farming decisions and were more vulnerable to exploitation than tenant farmers.


What is the difference between tenant and sharecropper?

A tenant pays rent to a landowner to use the land, while a sharecropper works the land in exchange for a share of the crops produced. Tenants have more independence and control over their farming operations compared to sharecroppers, who typically have less autonomy and may be more financially dependent on the landowner.


An advantage of sharecropping over slavery was?

An advantage of sharecropping over slavery was that sharecroppers had more independence and autonomy in their work. While still facing challenges, sharecroppers had the opportunity to negotiate terms and potentially earn a share of the profits from their labor.

Related questions

Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to what?

own plows


Was probably true about contracts between landowners and Sharecroppers?

The land owners took advantage of the sharecroppers leaving them poor and in need.


Does a farmer have to live on land to be a tenant farmer?

Not in the US, at least. With the shrinking number of farmers and more efficient farming methods, many farmers (if not most) farm at least some land that they do not live on but they are the tenant.


What are tenant farmers doing in response to hard times?

Tenant farmers facing hard times may seek alternative sources of income such as part-time employment, diversifying their crops, or seeking government assistance programs. They may also negotiate with landlords for more favorable lease terms or form cooperatives to share resources and cut costs. Ultimately, tenant farmers are likely to adapt their strategies to cope with the challenges of hard times in order to sustain their livelihoods.


What did the tenant farmers do with their possessions they could not sell or take with them during the great depression?

Invariably they were forced to abandon those possessions and lost them - making them even more poor than they were before.


Who were more likely to receive land provided by the homestead act?

Plains farmers were the group likely to have received land provided under the Homestead Act.


Why did the Nomad and farmers fight?

Early Nomads displayed aggression towards farmers while entering their land and likely instigated threat displays. We are more evolved now and do not have to worry about such things.


Why were businessmen and farmers likely to support American expansionism at the end of the nineteenth century?

Businessmen and farmers stood a lot to gain from American expansionism. They would have more markets to sell products to.


What were the key problems with sharecropping?

The negative effect of sharecropping and tenant farming was that it was tipped heavily in favor of the landowner. African American families would rent small shares of land to work themselves with a portion of the crop to be given to the landowner at the end of the harvest. However, the sharecroppers ended up owing more to the landowner, for the use of tools and for supplies, than they were able to repay. A sharecropper could move up to tenant farming if he could accumulate his own equipment and money. He could even become a cash tenant if he could rasie enough crops to sell. Unfortunately, due to crop failure, laziness, low crop prices, ill health, exhaustion of the soil, poor management, and high interest rates, many tenant farmers were unable to maintain their staus as cash or share tenants and ended up losing their farms.


How did the north and south differ in development after the civil war?

Before the Civil War the North was the more industrialized region, and this continued after the war. The North became more urban. The South, where most of the fighting occurred, slowly reconstructed itself in the face of Northern economic and political discrimination, and adopted an almost-feudal agricultural economy consisting of small farmers, share croppers and tenant farmers.


What was happening in the south by the spring of 1865?

Sharecropping and tenant farming developed to replace slavery.


What opportunities exsisted for sharecroppers who made money in a growing?

Sharecroppers who made money in a growing season could rent more land, could find another landowner to share crop for, or they could look for work in a town. (all of the above)