the question of why people vote when their individual vote stands little chance of making a difference
The paradox Mori refers to in paragraph 30 is the paradox of a machine being able to mimic human behavior so well that it becomes indistinguishable from a real human, yet lacking true understanding or consciousness. This paradox raises questions about what it truly means to be human and the limitations of artificial intelligence.
the tagalog or filpino of paradox is "baliktama"
suffrage
The paradox of participation refers to the phenomenon where individuals may choose not to participate in collective action or voting, despite believing that their participation is crucial for achieving a desired outcome. This occurs because each person's individual contribution seems insignificant, leading to a sense of apathy or resignation. Essentially, while everyone may agree that collective participation is important, the belief that their single action won't make a difference can result in low turnout or engagement. This paradox highlights the tension between individual rationality and collective benefit.
despite their support for tax cuts, the Republicans have sometimes outdone the Democrats in voting for government spending.
The paradox of value, or the diamond-water paradox, refers to the situation where essential items like water have low monetary value because they are plentiful, while non-essential items like diamonds have high monetary value despite being less essential. This paradox highlights the distinction between utility and scarcity in determining value.
The paradox of meat refers to the conflicting feelings people have about eating meat, such as enjoying its taste while feeling guilty about harming animals or the environment. This paradox challenges our understanding of food consumption by highlighting the ethical and environmental implications of our dietary choices.
A Southern paradox refers to contradictions or inconsistencies inherent in Southern culture, history, or identity. It may involve juxtapositions of values, behaviors, or perceptions that seem contradictory or unconventional when viewed together.
The statement that is not explained by the diamond-water paradox is the concept of marginal utility, which refers to the diminishing satisfaction or value that individuals derive from consuming additional units of a good or service.
The term 'electoral' refers to elections. The number of electoral states for example would be a term used. Electoral voting refers to people voting for the candidates in an election.
paradox = paradoha (however, the English word "paradox" is more common).
The checkerboard paradox refers to an optical illusion where two squares of the same color appear different due to the surrounding pattern. Even though the squares are the same color, the contrast with the surrounding squares creates a perception of difference. This paradox highlights how our brain interprets color and light in complex ways.