The Persian rule would best be described as trying to promote peace, security and prosperity.
The Persian rule would best be described as trying to promote peace, security and prosperity.
From Libya across to Central Asia.
AlexanderAlexander
They would have had to continue their struggle against Persian rule instead of going back to increasingly vicious and costly wars with each other. And Macedonia would not have been free form Persian rule to dominate the weakened Greek city-states.
We can not answer this question. We don't know the situations given you.
The exact content on "Desiporn" website can not be described since otherwise this answer would not be applicable for all ages - and thus would violate one of CrowdFlower's rule.
The Ionians were not satisfied with the tyrants appointed by Persia to rule them.
They tried to bring security, peace and prosperity to their empire while leaving habitual local government to remain in place.
Assimilation
the peacful rule of mongols in china
EXPLOITATION
The 26 dynasty was under the rule of the Nubians, it ended when the Persians invaded Egypt.
They retained traditional local government, while the empire provided security and encouraged prosperity.