Want this question answered?
The city of Pompeii did not burn, at least no more than any other ancient city. There has been little or no evidence of fire in the ruins.
what was the importance of the discovery of fire to ancient filipinos
fire
Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.Nero did not burn down Rome. Nero and his entire court were not even in the city, as like all emperors and nobles, they left Rome during the heat of the summer. Even the ancient writers say that the fire was started by accident by the Circus Maximus.
If you are referring to the great fire in Nero's reign, no one actually burnt the city. The fire started by accident in one of the shops that lined the Circus Maximus. It was a hot dry summer and the winds caused the fire to spread out of control. Poor old Nero got blamed for it because it was a known fact that he wanted to rebuild the slums of the city. The Christians , who were a disliked religious group due to their clannishness and aggressiveness, were hindering the firefighters and some ancient sources say that they even were seen carrying torches to spread the fire. This was due to the Christian belief at the time that Rome would be destroyed by fire before the Second Coming of Christ, which they thought was to happen immediately. So we have the blame game. Nero (who wasn't even in the city at the time) wanted cleared space for his building projects and the Christians who thought they were helping their God. So an accidental fire has become a two thousand year old controversy.
the ancient city of big mama was destriyed by fire in 79 A.D
The city of Pompeii did not burn, at least no more than any other ancient city. There has been little or no evidence of fire in the ruins.
what was the importance of the discovery of fire to ancient filipinos
The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.The ancient Romans did not discover fire. Fire had been around for thousands of years before Rome existed.
Pliny the Younger witnessed the 79AD eruption of Vesuvius. Here are some of his descriptions on the volcano that destroyed Pompeii. "Meanwhile on Mount Vesuvius broad sheets of fire and leaping flames blazed at several points, their bright glare emphasized by the darkness of night".
A City on Fire was created on 2009-12-21.
City on Fire - novel - was created in 1997.
Fire in the City of Automatons was created in 1999.
London +++ I don't think so! It would have been Londinium then anyway. Try Pompeii, overwhelmed by a volcanic eruption (Vesuvius).
City on Fire - novel - has 498 pages.
With fire.
fire