answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

false

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: The case of Feinberg v. New York established the process called judicial review.?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Does The case of Feinberg v. New York established the process called judicial review?

true


What is a willful obstruction of the judicial process?

It is called Contempt of Court


What is willful obstruction of the judicial process?

It is called Contempt of Court


The process of checking the laws of your land is called what?

Judicial Review.


What is the process of checking the laws of our land called?

Judicial Review


Is the case Feinberg v New York called Judicial Review?

No. Feinberg v. New York had nothing to do with judicial review as it applies to the US Supreme Court. Judicial review is the ability of the Supreme Court to review laws and Acts of Congress to determine their constitutionality. The New York case cited was simply a matter of a judge having his judicial record reviewed because he was accused of misconduct or corruption. These are two totally different concepts. Feinberg would be more appropriately categorized as a "review of judicial record."The Matter of Feinberg v. New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, 125, was a 2005 New York Court of Appeals case in which Michael Feinberg, a Brooklyn judge, was convicted of judicial misconduct for awarding a friend 8.5 million dollars worth of estate commissions without requiring the mandatory affidavit of legal services.According to the Court, Feinberg repeatedly showed a "shocking" disregard for the statutes governing court procedure and exhibited incompetence in law. He was also accused of appointing friends to public positions and granting unethical favors to political supporters.The Court determined Feinberg should be relieved of his judgeship, which ended his career.A question before the Court of Appeals was whether the Commission on Judicial Conduct had overstepped its bounds by pursuing the judge for legal errors. The court ruled that the question of legal incompetence and misconduct were not necessarily mutually exclusive, and were within the scope of the Commission's authority.The case most often associated with the concept of Judicial Review is Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803), an early US Supreme Court case.


What branch has the power to declare an executive act unconstitutional?

The Judicial Branch had this power. The process in which this branch declare laws constitutional or unconstitutional is called the Judicial Review


What is it called when judges move from established laws and go against tradition?

judicial activism <<>> Grounds for an appeal.


Which branch decides if laws are legal and what is the process called?

The judicial branch decides if laws are legal and it's called Checks and Balances.


A quasi judicial process in which a bureaucratic agency settles disputes between two parties is called administrative?

adjudication.


What is the term for the process used by the court system to interpret laws and find them constitutional or unconstitutional?

That is called Judicial Review.


A quasi-judicial process in which a bureaucratic agency settles disputes between two parties is called administarative.. What?

administrative adjudication