Want this question answered?
yes, but that does not mean he/she gets a cut of the proceeds. That is a separate issue and folks get paid (or dont) irregardless of where they live.
Many white Americans, especially in what is now the southeastern states, wanted the natives removed to the west because they wanted their lands and the resources under them, and because, generally, they did not like or trust the natives.
To force native Americans to relocate west of the Mississippi River
They lost almost everything they onwned. They were only allowed to keep whatever they could fit into a small bag (backpack).
Because at that time The U.S was at war with the Japanese and they didn't any spies from Japan coming to america also a lot of Japanese owned land around airplane factories
yes, but that does not mean he/she gets a cut of the proceeds. That is a separate issue and folks get paid (or dont) irregardless of where they live.
The act that Congress passed that allowed them to relocate the Native Americans was called the Indian Removal Act. It went in to effect in 1830 when Andrew Jackson was president.
Indian removal act
nearby cities
They rhought that japanse was bad person
Over 2,000 Native Americans were forced to relocate south.
nearby cities
Most Native Americans were practically forced to relocate to reservations.
John Hanson contributed to African Americans by fighting to relocate black Americans in Liberia. He also served as one of the first black senators in Grand Bassa County.
martin delany. >=(
When you are asked if you are ready to relocate with your immediate family to US as a new employee, you should consider all essential factors. Before making the decision you should look at what is at stake and how the move would affect your family.
To force native Americans to relocate west of the Mississippi River