Want this question answered?
No one really knows. Some will say the British Army, but most likely they were adapting earlier bullet designs.
Guerilla warfare is the use of unconventional tactics by adapting to one's environment and enemy in an effort to bring them down in any way possible.
Some historians and critics believe Dewey was more interested in adapting children to a state dominated society than to true education. They believed he modeled an American classroom that diminished the teaching of the classics, rejected the teachings of logic and rhetoric and preferred experience over debate.
Well...this a a common question that many Airmen (all ranks) have pondered over many decades; the answer can and will vary...depending on who you happen to be talking to; considering the varied values and principles in play of the perceiver. I have been serving in the USAF for over 14 years; before that I was raised under a military household. Over the years, I have observed an erosion of basic principles and ethical behavior that originally founded the framework from which all Airmen were created. A Chief, in the traditional sense, is one who has a genuine pulse of his/her enlisted people; as an ambassador for the enlisted corps, speaks with bold and passionate statements regarding the mission and overall purpose of why we are here, providing a sense of reality to the intuitive and strategic science projects that many officers wish to impose on the enlisted corps. A true mentor, having the ability to connect the things we do do a much larger picture and articulate that message from a balanced perspective establishing buy-in from the troops. Standing guard and providing watch over the fundamentals that the Air Force was founded upon. Is in it for others, and demonstrates that in both their words and more importantly actions-modeling and enforcing the professional, compassionate and ethical behavior expected of all Airmen. An E9 on the other hand in many ways is very similar, but in many ways the exact opposite. An E9 is in it for themselves; self centered and focused on their own career enhancement that that of the big picture and position of influence over others. They are more concerned with "what footprint will I leave on the Air Force that will go down in history books?" As opposed to focusing on the impact they are having here and now and the genuine respect they may or may not have from organization or troops below them. Losing sight of core fundamentals, E9s love change...and enforce change (how can we do things different); over the years and with the advancement of technology, the Air Force in particular (can't speak for the other services) has taken full advantage of the "ease of access" route; choosing to communicate via email, create spreadsheet upon spreadsheet, and make judgements based upon statistical data verses "getting out from behind the desk". We as an entire organization have dramatically lost the art of communication, focusing more on, "did you include the attachment" or "why are you yelling at me...email in all CAPS". Although it's only relevant to keep up with the changing environment, adapting as appropriate to meet mission requirements, we can't degrade the value of face-to-face communication and the importance of getting to genuinely know your troops. Their concerns, struggles, strengths...just to name a few. That is in my opinion, the difference between a Chief and an E9...the genuine don't care factor, and is it demonstrated in the behavior you model for your Airmen. Where is your focus...on self, or others...
umm pretty much the tanks sucked Amen. They were uncomfortable, noisy, and always breaking down. The engines produced sickening vapors for accompanying infantry. The armor was plate steel, and the crews had to wear chain-mail masks to protect their faces from slivers as the tanks were hit by enemy bullets. In short, hell on earth. Welcome to war in the 20th Century, but at least the tanks in later wars were better.
rotation
Challenges of trade unionism include managing conflicts between worker demands and employer interests, ensuring inclusive representation of diverse worker interests, navigating legal restrictions and regulations, and adapting to changing economic and technological landscapes that affect job security and labor conditions.
To adapt is to make suitable to requirements or conditions. To be adapted is to be adjusted to certain requirements or conditions.
Adapting to change, Choosing to evolve, Pushing past limits, Thriving through challenges.
By adapting themselves to such conditions.
Via and through hundreds of thousands of years of doing just that, adapting functions to suit conditions.
This question requires more information before it can be answered. Who's adapting? What are you adapting to?
Adapting to the dangerous eviorment ?
Esperanza encounters challenges such as living in difficult conditions in the camp, adapting to the hard work and long hours of the farm, and facing discrimination and prejudice from some of the other workers. She also struggles with letting go of her previous life of privilege and learning to work alongside others as equals.
Some animals are better at adapting to changing conditions and circumstances. Those that can adapt survive when conditions change, others die because they don't have the ability to adapt.
Some challenges of working with children include managing behavior, ensuring their safety and well-being, communicating effectively with them, and adapting activities to meet their needs and abilities. It also requires patience, creativity, flexibility, and good problem-solving skills to engage and support children effectively.
process of adapting traits from another culture is culture