Let us use tallness in men and women as our example.
In stabilizing selection a normal distribution of heights would be expected as the selective environment would not select against having all variants present in the population.
In directional selection you would see men and women getting increasingly taller ( or, perhaps shorter ) as natural selection selected the variants that were more reproductively successful in the immediate environment. ( say women's mate choice went into overdrive for tall men )
Disruptive selection is the distribution of traits that are at either tail of the distribution. Both short and tall people are represented, but no intermediates. These two dichotomous traits are seen in nature when one species feeds on two different food sources in the same area. Rather like small and large beaked birds. How humans could go through disruptive selection I leave to your analysis.
directional selection,stabilizing selection, anddisruptiveselection
disruptive selection
Stabilizing selection.
They both decrease genetic variation
Stabilizing selection is where a population is favored by just the right amount of a certain trait, and if they don't have the right amount of that certain trait then they die. Example: Human babies and birth weight, if the baby is too small, i gets sick. If the baby is too big, it cannot get through the pelvis; but just the right weight and it will come out lively and well. Disruptive selection is when an animal has to fit in with its environment; I.E., camouflage.
directional selection,stabilizing selection, anddisruptiveselection
stabilizing selection
disruptive selection
I'm not sure what "stabilizing directional" selection is, but if you get out a bell curve graph... Stabilizing selection tends to select for individuals around the average, or mean, of a population, which technically makes the curve steeper. Directional selection shifts the average in one direction (shifts the whole curve in one direction). Disruptive selection creates two new averages, which means it splits the one curve into two, smaller, separate curves.
Directional Selection - APEX
Stabilizing selection.
When natural selection favors the intermediate version of a characteristic, it is referred to as stabilizing selection. It is the opposite of disruptive selection.
Disruptive selectionNatural selection . Stabilizing selection. Directional selectionthe answer is one of these idk which one
They both decrease genetic variation
They both decrease genetic variation .
That would be disruptive selection.
They both decrease genetic variation .