When natural selection favors the intermediate version of a characteristic, it is referred to as stabilizing selection. It is the opposite of disruptive selection.
stabilizing selection
stabilizing
Stabilizing selection, which acts against both extreme phenotypes and favors intermediate variants. Hence the narrowing of the bell curve in the middle.
When nothing happens to exert strong population pressure on that population, natural selection favors the allele frequency already present. When mutations cause new traits, natural selection weeds these traits out because they're not as efficient as the others.
Right from the start, the terms "strong" and "favors" should be defined. Natural selection "favors" simply in that the mechanism allows the continuation of those who are better suited to their environment. "Strong" and "fittest" are synonymous in this regard, because it's not referring to physical strength. Natural selection only favors those who are able to survive long enough to reproduce and thus pass on their genes. That's all there really sis to it.
That would be the Stabilizing Selection where there will me not a lot of genetic variation. The curve of the population allele frequency would be quite thin with the extreme being in the middle.
If there is a genetic mutation in an individual strong enough to modify there chance of survival it opens the door for natural selection. If the effect is positive they are more likely to outlive their original species. If it is negative it decreases their chance of outliving their original species. Also known as survival of the fittest it favors positive trays by "eliminating" negative ones.
favors different phenotypes at different times
Stabilizing selection, which acts against both extreme phenotypes and favors intermediate variants. Hence the narrowing of the bell curve in the middle.
Tends to result in a population whose individuals have extreme traits is what? ----> it is directional selection
Directional selection: favors the phenotype at one extreme of a trait's range, selecting against the opposite extreme.Stabilizing selection: favors the intermediate phenotype, selecting against the phenotypes at both extremes of the trait's range.Disruptive selection: favors phenotypes at both extremes, selecting against the intermediate phenotype of the trait's range.
It is called evolution. After all, all characteristics, as far as evolution is concerned, are intermediate. They're all temporary variants, on their way to becoming something else.
It is called evolution. After all, all characteristics, as far as evolution is concerned, are intermediate. They're all temporary variants, on their way to becoming something else.
It is stabilizing selection
When natural selection favors extreme variations of a trait (ex. Biggest & Smallest)
When nothing happens to exert strong population pressure on that population, natural selection favors the allele frequency already present. When mutations cause new traits, natural selection weeds these traits out because they're not as efficient as the others.
It's mainly mutations in the DNA and recombination of chromosomes that produce the genetic variation. Natural selection then favors those changes that give rise to greater reproductive success.
Right from the start, the terms "strong" and "favors" should be defined. Natural selection "favors" simply in that the mechanism allows the continuation of those who are better suited to their environment. "Strong" and "fittest" are synonymous in this regard, because it's not referring to physical strength. Natural selection only favors those who are able to survive long enough to reproduce and thus pass on their genes. That's all there really sis to it.
Natural selection favors a trait by increasing its frequency in a population. Natural selection is differential reproductive success. If one variant of a trait enables an organism to have and raise more offspring successfully than other variants in a particualr environment, then it will become more common in the population.