No, it does not. In fact, it is relatively easy for government agencies to demand that service providers hand over personal data stored on its servers.
Boobaaa TUUUUU
Yes.
There are various risks associated with the confidentiality of written of electronic communications. When sending emails it is vitally important that you enter the exact email address otherwise the email may be sent to the wrong recipient. You cannot guarantee that the only person who has access to the email address you send to is the intended recipient. Email communications are susceptible to unauthorized access by third parties.
Definitions of communications are dependant on type. Visual and physical communications can involve motions and sign languages. Emotional communications regards reading and understanding he ques based on feelings. Speech communication is speaking, and identifying signals based on tones and voice. Digital communications are from emails, messaging, and other forms of electronic media and hardware.
The communication principles needed to apply for using electronic forms of written communication in a business environment are paraphrasing and writing skills. They are necessary for proper interpretation regardless of the type of communication. Password protected electronic signatures are helpful at protecting the reputation of a company through electronic communications.
Businesses and people send business letters to communicate information and to document that communication. Whether a business letter is physical paper sent through the mail or an electronic transmittal, the information is presented and a record of the communication can be retained by the sender and the recipient.
No it does not. Though it did appear to crack down on unauthorized eavesdropping, there are still many ways government agencies can get around this law to get personal information.
Yes.
No, it does not. In fact, it is relatively easy for government agencies to demand that service providers hand over personal data stored on its servers.
The U.S. Supreme Court.
Electronic "eavesdropping" at BOTH the federal and local levels is limited by the necessity of having a warrant issued by a judge after finding of probable cause to issue it. Without a warrant nothing gained by the electronic interception is admissable in court.
Katz v. United States is the answer 100 %
Kurt William Haase has written: 'An analysis of the methods and techniques of electronic eavesdropping and countermeasures' -- subject(s): Wiretapping, Eavesdropping
The question is too broad and too general to answer. There are multiple statutes covering these acts, primarily federal but also some state. Some or all are applicable depending on the specific scenario of the offense and which jurisdiction chooses to prosecute.
About the NSA's system of eavesdropping on worldwide electronic messages.
electronic communications privacy act
Computers are e-communications (electronic communications). They include: e-mails, fax, websites, and electronic documents.
Electronic Communications Privacy Act