Want this question answered?
more money
knights of labor
The Knights advocated broad changes in society, while the AFL focused on specific workers' issues
The Knights advocated broad changes in society, while the AFL focused on specific workers' issues
As in any developing country, labor and employing companies always had their differences. The Knights of Labor group was the first well recognized labor union and it was all inclusive, meaning almost anybody (women, blacks and but not Chinese) was welcomed. I think the Chinese were admitted at a later date. After the American Federation of Labor (AFL) was formed, the Knights of Labor fell out of favor and disappeared. The major difference was the Knights of Labor formed the foundation upon which the AFL was born. Their demise was a natural evolution of the labor movement in this country. The Knights of Labor lacked good management and their inability to carry out successful strikes for their members caused their ranks to be recruited by the AFL.
As in any developing country, labor and employing companies always had their differences. The Knights of Labor group was the first well recognized labor union and it was all inclusive, meaning almost anybody (women, blacks and but not Chinese) was welcomed. I think the Chinese were admitted at a later date. After the American Federation of Labor (AFL) was formed, the Knights of Labor fell out of favor and disappeared. The major difference was the Knights of Labor formed the foundation upon which the AFL was born. Their demise was a natural evolution of the labor movement in this country. The Knights of Labor lacked good management and their inability to carry out successful strikes for their members caused their ranks to be recruited by the AFL.
As in any developing country, labor and employing companies always had their differences. The Knights of Labor group was the first well recognized labor union and it was all inclusive, meaning almost anybody (women, blacks and but not Chinese) was welcomed. I think the Chinese were admitted at a later date. After the American Federation of Labor (AFL) was formed, the Knights of Labor fell out of favor and disappeared. The major difference was the Knights of Labor formed the foundation upon which the AFL was born. Their demise was a natural evolution of the labor movement in this country. The Knights of Labor lacked good management and their inability to carry out successful strikes for their members caused their ranks to be recruited by the AFL.
The Knights advocated broad changes in society, while the AFL focused on specific workers' issues
The Knights advocated broad changes in society, while the AFL focused on specific workers' issues
Two prominent differences between the two was the the Knights of Labor were much more of a secret society type group, while the AFL was a very formal federation of labor Unions. The other main difference was the the Knights of Labor were much more radical than the AFL, admitting unskilled workers, African Americans, and women, unlike the AFL.
What "The Knights of Labor" were most interested in is open to interpretation. It depends solely upon what an individual perceives as the true motivation and ultimate goal of the Knights of Labor. Essentially, it was a National Union. Factoid** As the organization splintered and fell into obscurity one group formed what is now the AFL-CIO. The Knights of Labor was more interested in broad reform.
The Knights of Labor was organized and grew to more than 700,000 members. After some of its members were accused of using violence, the Knights lost members and influence in 1890s. The American Federation of Labor (AFL) pushed for higher wages, better working conditions, and the right to bargain collectively. Many workers used strikes to achieve their goals. They refused to do their jobs until their employers agreed to certain demands.