executive powers of his office
strong-mayor system
In a weak mayor system the city council has more influence and in a strong mayor system the actual mayor has more.
Yes, Newark, NJ, operates under a strong mayor system. This means that the mayor has significant executive powers, including the authority to appoint and remove department heads, propose budgets, and implement city policies without needing extensive approval from the city council. The strong mayor system is designed to enable more decisive leadership and quicker responses to city issues. However, it also means that the mayor holds considerable influence over city governance.
The city of Houston has a strong mayor-council government. The City's elected officials, serving concurrent two year terms, are: the mayor, the city comptroller and 14 members of the city council. Under the strong mayor-council government, the mayor serves as the executive officer of the city. As the city's chief administrator and official representative, the mayor is responsible for the general management of the city and for seeing that all laws and ordinances are enforced. from wiki-pedia
The city of Houston has a strong mayor-council government. The City's elected officials, serving concurrent two year terms, are: the mayor, the city comptroller and 14 members of the city council. Under the strong mayor-council government, the mayor serves as the executive officer of the city. As the city's chief administrator and official representative, the mayor is responsible for the general management of the city and for seeing that all laws and ordinances are enforced. from wiki-pedia
executive power
The fear of a strong executive stems primarily from historical experiences with authoritarian regimes and the potential for abuse of power. This concern is rooted in the belief that concentrated power can lead to tyranny and the erosion of democratic principles. Moreover, the framers of the U.S. Constitution were particularly wary of a powerful executive because of their experiences under British monarchy, leading them to create a system of checks and balances to prevent any one branch from becoming too dominant. Ultimately, the apprehension about a strong executive reflects a broader commitment to safeguarding individual liberties and ensuring accountability.
Executive power
The government under the Articles of Confederation was characterized by a weak central authority, as it lacked the power to levy taxes, regulate commerce, or enforce laws. However, it did allow for the establishment of a postal service and the management of foreign affairs. The statement that the government had strong executive power is false, as there was no executive branch under the Articles. Thus, the government was primarily a confederation of sovereign states with limited federal power.
executive
Yatim Rais has written: 'Freedom under executive power in Malaysia' -- subject(s): Politics and government, Executive power, Rule of law
The power to levy taxes is considered executive and can therefore be handled by an institution under the executive arm of the government. Governments get a large amount of income from taxes.