the burden of proof
A paradox doesn't have to be a conclusion from an argument it can be an absurd or contradictory statement or proposition which when investigated may prove to be well founded or true.
An argument is inductive when it is based on probability, such as statistics. In an inductive argument, if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
Inductive argumentInductive Argument
Loop dialogue is also called circular argument. It is logically inconsistent and calls on itself as an authority to prove itself. Such would be; The bible is true because it says in the bible that the bible is true.
sorry, you cannot prove that something is true if it is not true!
The argument you plan to prove
The argument you plan to prove
An argument is inductive when it is based on probability, such as statistics. In an inductive argument, if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
A logical sequence in an argument is a way to prove a step has a logical consequence. Every proposition in an argument must be tested in this fashion to prove that every action has a reaction.
The claim is the argument you plan to prove.
A deductively valid argument is if the premises are true then the conclusion is certainly true, not possibly true. The definition does not say that the conclusion is true.
You create a theory. Prove the theory to be true by testing it. If it works, it is true. If it does not work, it is not true.