0
What argument is characterized by its support rather than its ability to prove its conclusion?
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Inductive argument
Inductive Argument
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
An inductive argument is characterized by its support rather than its ability to conclusively prove its conclusion. Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations or evidence, which may support a conclusion but not guarantee its truth.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is deductive argument?
A deductive argument is a logical reasoning process where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Deductive arguments are characterized by their validity, meaning that the conclusion cannot be false if the premises are true.
A supporting component of an argument which outlines the reasons for accepting the conclusion is known as the?
Premises. These are statements or propositions that provide evidence or support for a conclusion in an argument.
What are the two parts of an argument?
The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.
If the conclusion of an argument is exactly as probable as its negation given the premises of the argument the the argument is weak?
Yes, if the conclusion of an argument is just as likely to be false as it is to be true based on the premises provided, then the argument is considered weak because it does not provide strong support for the conclusion. The premises should logically lead to the conclusion, rather than leaving it equally likely to be true or false.
What makes a argument valid or strong?
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. This means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. An argument is strong if the premises provide good support for the conclusion, making it likely to be true.
What purpose does the conclusion of an argument serve?
The conclusion of an argument serves to summarize the main points presented in the argument, reiterate the main claim or thesis, and provide a sense of closure to the discussion. It offers the final opportunity to persuade the audience by restating the key reasons and reinforcing the validity of the argument.
A logical fallacy is an argument in which the resons or arguments given for the conclusion support it?
Actually, a logical fallacy is a flaw in reasoning that makes an argument invalid, unsound, or weak. It occurs when there is a mistake in the logic being used to reach a conclusion. Common examples include ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, and appeals to emotion.
What is deductive argument?
A deductive argument is a logical reasoning process where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Deductive arguments are characterized by their validity, meaning that the conclusion cannot be false if the premises are true.
What is the purpose of an argument's conclusion?
Answer this question… To restate the central point of the argument and make a final bid for the audience's support
What part of an argument restates the central point and makes a bid for the audience's support?
Answer this question… Conclusion
How is inductive reasoning used to support an argument?
Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. In an argument, it is used to provide support by presenting a series of instances that lead to a probable conclusion. However, it is important to note that conclusions drawn from inductive reasoning are not guaranteed to be true, as they are based on probability rather than certainty.
A good question upon which to base a research essay must lead to debatable conclusions In other word it is the writer's job to?
arrive at a conclusion based on an interpretation of the data, then build a convincing argument to support it.
What is used to support an opposing argument?
Counterarguments or evidence that contradicts or challenges the main argument can be used to support an opposing argument. These counterarguments present different perspectives and provide alternative explanations or ideas that weaken the strength of the original argument. They help to foster critical thinking and ensure an examination of various viewpoints before arriving at a conclusion.
What is taking an opponent's argument to its illogical conclusion?
Taking an opponent's argument to its illogical conclusion, also known as reductio ad absurdum, involves extending their argument to an extreme or absurd scenario to highlight its flaws or logical inconsistencies. This technique aims to demonstrate that following the opponent's argument leads to unreasonable or nonsensical outcomes.
The because part of you argument offering support for you assertion?
The premises is the main assertion of a logical argument. It is the 'because of this' part. Usually because is the creator of a main proposition (premises), or one of them, that the conclusion must logically rest upon. Premise...conclusion. because of this...this. Within the body of the argument, between the premises and the conclusion , is the area where inferences occur. An inference is a proposition that is derived from the assertion of one or more accepted premises (propositions). Inferences can normally be spotted by statements like 'infers that', or implies that', or 'therefore.
What makes an effective argument?
sound premises + strong facts + strong conclusion = effective solid argument
What is used to support a conclusion?
a conclusion helps the data
