0
If the conclusion of an argument is exactly as probable as its negation given the premises of the argument the the argument is weak?
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Yes, if the conclusion of an argument is just as likely to be false as it is to be true based on the premises provided, then the argument is considered weak because it does not provide strong support for the conclusion. The premises should logically lead to the conclusion, rather than leaving it equally likely to be true or false.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is a logical conclusion?
A logical conclusion is a judgment or result reached through reasoning and evidence that follows logically from the premises or information presented. It is the final step in the process of deductive or inductive reasoning where one can infer what is most likely or probable based on the information available.
What is an argument that starts from a specific idea to reach a genral conclusion?
An argument that starts from a specific idea to reach a general conclusion is known as inductive reasoning. In this type of reasoning, specific observations or data points are used to draw a broader conclusion that is considered probable, but not necessarily definitive. Inductive reasoning allows for the generalization of patterns or trends based on specific instances.
How is inductive reasoning used to support an argument?
Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. In an argument, it is used to provide support by presenting a series of instances that lead to a probable conclusion. However, it is important to note that conclusions drawn from inductive reasoning are not guaranteed to be true, as they are based on probability rather than certainty.
What are the characteristics of inductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical reasoning that involves making generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. It relies on gathering sufficient evidence to draw a probable conclusion, rather than proving a definitive truth. Inductive reasoning is useful for forming hypotheses and making predictions in scientific research and everyday decision-making.
Deductive reasoning is much better than inductive reasoning.?
Inductive reasoning takes a specific representative case or facts and then draws generalizations or conclusions from them. Inductive reasoning must be based on a sufficient amount of reliable evidence. In other words, the facts you draw on must fairly represent the larger situation or population. Example:Fair trade agreements have raised the quality of life for coffee producers, so fair trade agreements could be used to help other farmers as well.In this example the specific case of fair trade agreements with coffee producers is being used as the starting point for the claim. Because these agreements have worked the author concludes that it could work for other farmers as well.Deductive reasoning begins with a generalization and then applies it to a specific case. The generalization you start with must have been based on a sufficient amount of reliable evidence.Example:Genetically modified seeds have caused poverty, hunger, and a decline in bio-diversity everywhere they have been introduced, so there is no reason the same thing will not occur when genetically modified corn seeds are introduced in Mexico.In this example the author starts with a large claim, that genetically modified seeds have been problematic everywhere, and from this draws the more localized or specific conclusion that Mexico will be affected in the same way.
What is the definition of inductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning is " reasoning in which the premises seek to supply strong evidence for (not absolute proof of) the truth of the conclusion. While the conclusion of a deductive argument is supposed to be certain, the truth of the conclusion of an inductive argument is supposed to be probable, based upon the evidence given.". This is the reasoning behind most for scientific and mathematical studies.
What prefix would you use for the word probable?
pro
What is a logical conclusion?
A logical conclusion is a judgment or result reached through reasoning and evidence that follows logically from the premises or information presented. It is the final step in the process of deductive or inductive reasoning where one can infer what is most likely or probable based on the information available.
How do you create an inductive argument?
you start by creating premises that make the conclusion probable but not necessary (as is the case with deductive arguments). For example, Socrates was Greek Most Greeks ate fish Therefore, Socrates probably ate fish this is an inductive argument, because it is based on probability. the natural sciences frequently use this type of argument Answer First pick your subject and have ready certain facts which can be put forward for discussion. The facts may be argued for or against, but in the end all come to a general conclusion of the possibility that the facts contain enough evidence to argue the point, certainly enough to satisfy all concerned that the possibility that the evidence put for or against has merrit.
How many times can the police search your premises?
Short answer = as many time as they have a warrant, probable cause or reasonable suspicions to do so. US law and it will vary from state to state.
How is propaganda different from argument?
Propaganda is the dissemination of information, ideas, or rumors to influence people's beliefs or actions, often using misleading or biased tactics. Arguments, on the other hand, are based on logical reasoning and evidence to support a claim or point of view. While propaganda aims to manipulate emotions or perceptions, arguments are structured and rely on persuasion through rational thought.
What is required for law enforcement officers to obtain a search warrant?
Probable cause that the objects or contraband they are searching for will be found on the premises - submit a signed and sworn affidavit to a magistrate or judge and - the judges signature on the warrant.
What is an confirmation of dispatch?
When the ordered goods leave the company premises, the authority issues 'Confirmation of Dispatch' to the customer,stating the exact date,time,mode of dispatch and probable time it will take to reach customer's hands.
What makes a search warrant valid?
A warrant is VALIDATED by the signature of the approving judge or magistrate. An APPLICATION for a warrant must include enough information (who-what-when-where-how) and include "probable cause" that what is sworn to in the warrant is taking place within the premises named.
Can police keep getting a search warrant for your house every month?
A search warrant can be issued any time there is probable cause to believe there is evidence of a crime at a location. There are no limits to how many times or how often a warrant for the same premises can be issued.
What are the comparative and superlative forms of the word probable?
more probable most probable
What is the adjective of probable?
probable is an adjective
