It sounds like what might be a very effective rhetorical device if used skilfully. The idea would be to take elements of the opponent's argument and use the facts presented to support outcomes that few if any would support.
Taking an opponent's argument to its illogical conclusion, also known as reductio ad absurdum, involves extending their argument to an extreme or absurd scenario to highlight its flaws or logical inconsistencies. This technique aims to demonstrate that following the opponent's argument leads to unreasonable or nonsensical outcomes.
Begging the questionScandalous
Yes. The image is of someone sitting on a fence, not coming down on either side. Sitting on the fence can mean not taking any firm stand on anything, not just in an argument. See the related link for more information.
In a DBQ (Document-Based Question), an argument beyond means taking the information provided in the documents and using it to form an original thesis or hypothesis that goes beyond just summarizing the content. This type of argument demonstrates critical thinking and the ability to analyze historical events or trends in a broader context.
The first main point of a thesis statement is to clearly state the topic of the paper and the stance or argument that the writer will be taking. It provides a roadmap for the reader to understand the main focus of the paper.
The assembly decides that the suitors should be expelled from Odysseus' house for their disrespectful behavior and abuse of hospitality. They agree with Telemachus and show their support by stating that it is not right for the suitors to continue taking advantage of Odysseus' absence.
Nope, Just taking off the item
Begging the questionScandalous
taking everything into account on the whole overall
Yes. The image is of someone sitting on a fence, not coming down on either side. Sitting on the fence can mean not taking any firm stand on anything, not just in an argument. See the related link for more information.
When you infer, you use clues from what you are reading along with what you already know. When you draw a conclusion, you are only taking into account what you are reading.
The pronoun 'that' is functioning as a demonstrative pronoun as the subject of the sentence 'that was your conclusion'. The pronoun 'that' is taking the place of the noun 'conclusion'.It's a bit easier to see if you place the parts of the sentence in a different order:That was your conclusion about the strange lights in the sky, a new airplane? (that = conclusion)
In "Taking Sides" by Gary Soto, Tony is having an argument with his best friend, Sean. The two boys disagree about whether to wear their school uniforms properly to impress a girl they both like. The argument escalates as Tony feels pressure to choose between impressing Sean or following his own conscience.
Trudy Govier has written: 'A Practical Study of Argument, 5th ed' 'Socrates' Children' 'A practical study of argument' 'Taking Wrongs Seriously' 'The Philosophy of Argument (Studies in Critical Thinking & Informal Logic, Vol. 3)' 'Selected Issues in Logic and Communication'
There is no reason...if you taste flower while taking hydrocodone then youll taste them without using the drug. My conclusion is you just like eating/tasting flowers
he tried to escape by taking his soldiers across the york river in boats.
Pene grande
The writer wants the reader to come to a common-sense conclusion on his or her own