the original ratio is 1:3,000
30,001
1:30,000, but every state should have at least one representative
Does this question mean 'how many representatives would a state of 30,000 have'? If so, the answer is 1. You can't have less than 1, and the going ratio right now is about 1:650,000.
The ratio of each state's population to the population of all the states at the time of the last official census should equal the ratio of the state's Representatives to all the Representatives.
legislators
constituents
The number of voting members of the U. S. House of Representatives has been 435 since March 4, 1913. The only time it is different is between the addition of a new state to the Union and the subsequent reapportionment.
Unlike the Senate, which gives two Senators to every state, the House of Representatives gives a number of representatives to each state, in proportion to the population of that state. So larger states have more representatives. This logically follows from the idea that all citizens are represented equally in a democracy. A million citizens in one state would logically have ten times the representation of a hundred thousand citizens in a smaller state.
constituents
In the US, the term of house of representatives means the Congressional branch called the House of Representatives. Here, delegates to the House are based on elections by the citizens of a State,
The Roman Republic.
It was the Roman Republic
Senators are independent of representatives. The number of representatives per state depends on the population of that state. However, there are always two senators for each state no matter what the population size. the number of senators and representatives do not depend on each other.