In court the question would be a true statement.
Pre-trial however, the first step would be to review law enforcement's evidence against the defendant to determine if they (the prosecutor) can present a prosecutable case to court.
direct examination vevablunt
direct examination, first
Direct examination is when the witness is FIRST questioned in court by an attorney (usually their own lawyer), when he is questioned by the opposing side it is called "cross-examination."
Thinking and questioning are the first step in the scientific method.
In a field interview statements are generally in the notebook. In a station interview the interview is most often recorded and transcribed later.
Always. In fact, one method of proving a quadrilateral a rhombus is by first proving it a parallelogram, and then proving two consecutive sides congruent, diagonals bisecting verticies, etc.
The First Place In Australia To Witness The Sun Rise Is Byron Bay
The first.
If malice can be proved it strengthens the prosecutions case for pre-meditated murder, or Murder in the First Degree.
A witness (person who knew what happened/) who was actually there. A second-person witness would be someone who got told what happened BY a first person witness. First person witnesses are also called first hand witnesses
Anton Van was the first man to witness a lve cell under a microscope.
It is courtroom jargon rather than an idiom. To cross-examine means for the other side in the case to question the same witness. The "cross" part is added because the goal of the other person questioning the person is opposite that of the first person to do so. If a defense attorney asks a witness what they saw and their description paints the defendant in a positive light, then the prosecutor will want to cross-examine the witness to try to find holes in the story or convince the courtroom that they didn't see what they claimed to have seen.