answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

it was known for vilonce

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: The static warfare of world war 1 was known as?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why can it be said that World War 2 was a War of Movement?

Mobile warfare (Blitzkrieg) as compared to the static trenchlines of WW1 .


What type of war is World War 1 known for?

World War 1 was known for its long and dangerous trench warfare and for extended artillery bombardments.


When warfare in world war 2?

Warfare in World War 2 are illegal and dangerous than warfare in World War 1.


What was the significance of static warfare in world war 1?

Static warfare was significant to the psychological impact on soldiers. Because they could not predict the future or plan for it, the men were constantly on guard. There was also a feeling of claustrophobia because the men could not flee or actively defend themselves.


How did World War 1 change the nature of warfare?

World War 1 introduced aerial warfare with airplanes and trench warfare


Which war is World War I?

The one in 1914 to 18, known for trench warfare, much of it was fought in northern France/Belgium, and was also be known as 'The Great War', generally before WW2.


How did aerial war affect World War 1?

For the first time it made visible what was going on behind enemy lines. (Other than by use of static balloons) It made warfare 3 dimensional.


What kind of Warfare was in World War I and 2?

in world war 1 warfare was mainly fought in the trenches and in world war 2 there was alot of invasions and bombing.


What was the style of World War 1 and World War 2?

In WW1 there was a trench warfare. In the 2nd there was a different style of warfare. Like Urban Warfare or Blitzkrieg


Is there a World War 3 in Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3?

Modern Warfare 3 IS World War 3.


What was the styles warfare called in world war 2?

trench warfare chemical warfare


Was warfare good in World War 1?

warfare is never good