answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: The supreme court case of munn v. lllinois decided that?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Who decided whether or not the Supreme Court will review a cases?

who decides whether or not the supreme court will review a case


A supreme court case must be decided by?

a simple majority


Can you write a sentence using the word supreme?

The supreme court decided to throw out the case.


Before their case is decided before the supreme court of the United states what must the parties to the case do?

Before their cases is decided before the Supreme court of the United States, the parties must make their final submissions.


What precedent did Marbury v. Madison set?

In 1803, Marshall decided a case that increased the power of the supreme court.


The supreme court case of munn v Illinois decided that?

the granger laws were legal


What did the Supreme Court decided in the case and what was President Jackson's response to the court ruling?

He took matters into his own hands


What city did the Supreme Court neet to decide the Dred Scott v Sanford case?

The Supreme Court met in Washington, D.C. when it decided the Dred Scott case. It has met in Washington for every case since February 1801.


What did Marbury v. Madison set?

In 1803, Marshall decided a case that increased the power of the supreme court.


Was Emmett Till's court case a supreme court case?

No it was not a supreme court case, but a state case because it was held in the local court


What supreme court case allows correctional officials to prohibit inmate visitation of friends and relatives?

In Overton V.S Bazzetta is the Supreme Court case which set regulations on inmate visitation of friends and family. This court case was decided on June 16th, 2003, and was decided to help with security problems that occurred in the Michigan Prison.


Which supreme court case decided that demonstrations cannot be dispersed because of the unruliness of spectators?

Gregory v. Chicago