the reorganization of the supreme court
No. The US Supreme Court is not a legislative body; they don't make laws. The President can discuss legislative ideas with Congress - the Senate and House of Representatives.
Declare bills (proposed ideas to become laws) unconstitutional or not. Also, settle court cases, if it is justifiable under the law.
narrow interpretation is the in between interpretation of the judges of the supreme court. In a narrow interpretation the judges fallow what is on the constitution but also their ideas.
he decides to go on a raft to his home
Just throwing some ideas out there... 1. An amendment to the constitution can be made if the Supreme court's decision is unpopular. (2/3 of both houses or a state convention to propose) 2. New laws can be made that kind of skirt around the rules- we all know the government can be sly. 3. The executive branch does not have to enforce the Supreme court's decision. example: even though the supreme court said that "relocating" the Native Americans was in violation of the constitution, Andrew Jackson still led on with the trail of tears.
i had to do alot of research but there are a couple, they might not be the exact right thing but it can give you plenty of ideas.. peta.org whitecases.com aboutmyplanet.net (:
Conservative ideas have influenced the Supreme Court by shaping the interpretation and application of the Constitution. Justices who hold conservative beliefs tend to prioritize originalism (interpreting the Constitution as its framers intended) and judicial restraint (limiting the Court's power to avoid activism). This can result in conservative rulings on issues such as gun rights, religious freedom, and limited government intervention.
President Franklin Roosevelt had a key and new idea which would have allowed many of his controversial laws to pass. FDR wanted to increase the number of Supreme Court Justices which shared his own ideas. This socalled "packing the Court" idea failed to materialize.
to decides whether a law is Constitutional , proposes that when a justice reaches age 70, the president should be allowed to add another justice and get senates to approve presidential appointing
No, stealing ideas is not a criminal offense. However, if someone infringes on intellectual property rights by using, selling, or distributing the stolen ideas, legal action can be pursued through civil court. It is important to protect ideas through patents, copyrights, or trademarks to have legal recourse if they are stolen.
A couple of ideas to start with: The justices of the supreme court start out being nominated by the president. The nominees have to be cleared by the senate, but nobody gets appointed without first being nominated by the president. So the president has some considerable influence over the supreme court's makeup and philosophy, potentially, for years after his term as president ends. It depends of course on how many justices die or retire. Presidents also get to make sweeping appointments to the Federal Court system when they first take office.