Historians use the time and place rule because the source is deemed to be more reliable. The other rule historians use is the bias rule that says everyone will be biased in some way when recounting events.
closer in time and place
a firsthand record of a person,place, or event that has not been interpreted by another author
No
American colonies' break from British rule
an ancient roman event
closer in time and place
It is a true statement that the time and place rule determines that the closer in time and place a source and its creator were to an event in the past.
more valuable the source will be
the source is more valuable
the source is more valuable
The time and place rule determines where and when a contract offer must be accepted in order to be valid. It requires that the acceptance must be communicated within a reasonable time frame and at the same place where the offer was made, unless otherwise specified in the offer.
D. The closer the author of a source was to the event in both time and place, the more valuable the source will be. (Apex)
A person can be considered a primary source if they directly experienced or witnessed an event they are describing, providing firsthand accounts or original data without interpretation or analysis. Primary sources are valuable for historians and researchers seeking unfiltered information from the time of the event.
It is unknown the creator of the event.
Frequency determines the number of times an event is repeated in a unit time. Event could be anything in general.
Yes, news film footage can be considered a primary source as it captures real-time events as they occur. It provides direct and unfiltered information about a particular event, making it a valuable resource for historical research or analysis.
(for industry) An event source could also be a term referring to resource. Example of event resource: staff, caterers, tenting etc.