0
The two most controversial foreign policy issues Reagan dealt with in his second term were?
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are foreign policy issues?
Foreign policy issues are matters that impact a country's relations with other nations, such as diplomacy, defense, trade, and international cooperation. These issues can include conflict resolution, human rights, economic sanctions, and agreements on environmental protection. Effective foreign policy aims to promote a country's national interests while fostering stability and cooperation in the global community.
What does the Reagan's Foreign policy called for?
a making an alliance etc.
Reagan followed the foreign policy of?
Reagan’s Foreign Policy The Reagan Administration also came to Washington determined to combat communism—especially in Latin America. Reagan and his advisers focused in particular on El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Cuba. Haig decided to make El Salvador a "test case" of his foreign policy.
What was a major element of Reagan foreign policy?
Increasing defense spending
What major foreign policy scandal happened under Reagan?
Lieing
Whose controversial economic policy helped the US out of the recession by lowering taxes in the 1980s?
Ronald Reagan
Whose controversial economic policy helped the US out of the recession by lowering taxes in the 1980S's?
Ronald Reagan
What was true of Kennedy's presidency?
that it ended too early. His domestic concerns largely took a backseat to foreign policy issues
What was a major element of Ronald Reagan's foreign policy?
Increasing defense spending
What are the most controversial issue in the Philippines?
Philippine controversial issues are divorce, reproductive health, integrated population and development policy.
What foreign policy crises did Ronald Reagan have during his presidency?
the end of the cold war.
Why is judicial involvement in policy issues controversial?
2. Judicial involvement in policy issues so controversial because each judge interprets the constitution in different way and sometimes they can do it for public benefit. They can choose to be judge base on judicial restraint or judicial activist.
