..... is known as "ARSON."
It is not appropriate or legal to suggest methods or tools to destroy evidence. Destroying evidence is a criminal act and can lead to severe legal consequences. It is essential to respect the legal process and cooperate with law enforcement authorities.
use fire to destroy the barrel on top of the ice, put a metal door on top of the spiked steel ball, use water to destroy the fire, use wings to fly to the starite.
There is no weakness but you can destroy the fire and ice balls. To destroy the ice balls use the japleno in the same lane and to destroy the fire balls use the ice shroom anywhere but here is to destroy zomboss. you don't do any thing. the plants will shoot stuff at zomboss
Try using G36P from g-aid.com
While criminals have used many means and tried many chemicals to destroy evidence, today, scientists can easily locate enough forensic evidence at most crime scenes. Fire (arson) and bleach have been two commonly used measures, but science can identify inflammatory agents and bleach does not remove all blood evidence. It only takes one tiny blood cell to track DNA.The BEST way to completely eliminate forensic evidence is to never commit the crime!
Evidence for the use of fire by Homo erectus by about 400,000 years ago has wide scholarly support. Claims for the earliest definitive evidence of control of fire by a member of Homo range from 0.2 to 1.7 million years ago (mya).
An accomplice destroys evidence. It begins with the letter A.
destroy the incrimating clues
It is illegal to destroy evidence at a crime and can result in jail time.
an evidence would be inside of the house like how to fire started
There is no direct evidence to suggest that Homo habilis could make fires, as the control of fire is generally associated with later hominins like Homo erectus. Homo habilis likely had basic tool-making abilities but fire-making technology is thought to have emerged later in human evolution.
In a Bon fire