There are a number of problems associated with running a direct democracy, including voter apathy and the ability of a majority to remove the civil rights.
False
It was direct democracy - the citizens met in fortnightly assembly and decided on issues, which decisions were implemented by the council. Today's democracies are representative democracies - citizens elect members of parliament to direct government.
It was direct democracy - the citizens met in fortnightly assembly and decided on issues, which decisions were implemented by the council. Today's democracies are representative democracies - citizens elect members of parliament to direct government.
It was direct democracy - the citizens met in fortnightly assembly and decided on issues, which decisions were implemented by the council. Today's democracies are representative democracies - citizens elect members of parliament to direct government.
false
Canada and china are democracies
canada and china are democracies
Yes, but only formal democracies.
The two types of democracies are direct democracies, or pure democracies, and indirect democracies, or more often referred to as representative democracies. The two differ in their distribution of political power; in a direct democracy, political power is held by all citizens of the state and in an indirect democracy, political power is held by an elect group of citizens.
I don't think you will find many, IF ANY, pure democracies today (were there every any?). You will find it in practice in different levels of government on a small scale, but that's about it. California has a system of dir. dem. in place, but it has many short comings.
A Democracy in which the people get to vote on a representative for them.
The Atheians had direct democracy - the citizens met in fortnightly assembly and voted on issues. Modern democracies are representative democracies - citizens elect members to vote on their behalf in a parliament. Both have their strengths and weaknesses, but the size of most modern democracies prohibits citizens attending regular meetings.
It was direct democracy - far fuller than today's representative democracies. The citizens met in fortnightly assembly and made decisions on all matters before them. These decisions were implemented by the Council without question. In today's representative democracies, elected members of parliaments can do what they like until the next election.