0
They will be living in their new house by next year Is this sentence grammatically correct?
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Yes it is.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is he tours the house a correct grammar?
"He tours the house" is a grammatically proper sentence, but it would normally include an adverb of repetitious time, such as "frequently", at the end of the sentence as given. If the reference is to a single incident, it could be expressed more idiomatically in the present progressive tense as "He is touring the house."
Is it grammatically correct to say that haunted house looks very mysterious to you?
Yes, it is grammatically correct to say "The haunted house looks very mysterious to you." You can also say "You find the haunted house very mysterious."
Is this grammatically correct John told us that him and Scott were playing at his house?
" John told us that him and Scott were playing at his house."No, the sentence is not correct. The personal pronoun 'him' is the objective form used as the subject of the verb 'were playing'.The correct subjective pronoun is: "John told us that he and Scott were playing at his house."
Is it grammatically correct to say back to home?
No, it is not grammatically correct to say "back to home." The correct phrase is "back home" or "back to the house."
Do the sentences given in the Discussion Area on this question have the same meaning?
1. He lives in the house across the road.The above sentence is correct grammatically.2. He lives in the house over the road.The above sentence is INcorrect grammatically. You can cross over the road, but the house is not 'over' the road. If a house was 'over' a road, the house would be hovering above the road.3. He lives in the house across the street.The above sentence is correct grammatically.4. He lives in the house over the street.This is the same as question #2. A house is not 'over' a street or road.5. I saw the children wandering slowly across the road.The above sentence is correct grammatically.6. I saw the children wandering slowly over the road.For the same reasons as #2 and #4, the above is INcorrect.7. I saw the children wandering slowly across the street.The above sentence is correct grammatically.8. I saw the children wandering slowly over the street.For the same reasons as #2, #4, and #6, the above is INcorrect.9. I was fortunate to get across the road without being knocked over.The above sentence is correct grammatically.10. I was fortunate to get over the road without being knocked over.For the same reasons as #2, #4, #6, and #8, the above is INcorrect.11. I was fortunate to get across the street without being knocked over.The above sentence is correct grammatically.12. I was fortunate to get over the street without being knocked over.For the same reasons as #2, #4, #6, #8, and #10, the above is INcorrect.Consider the differences in following correct sentences:I could only walk across the street by jumping over the potholes.He lives in the house across the road, but with a jetpack invention he could travel over the road to my house.Over means above, not on the surface. So I can't walk 'over' a street or road.I can walk along, down, up, or across a street or road.
When can you come or when you can come which is grammatically correct?
Both are grammatically correct depending on how you are using it. Ex. "When can you come to my house?" or "When you can come to my house, we will finally be able to play my computer game."
Is this grammatically correct John told us that him and Scott were playing at his house?
" John told us that him and Scott were playing at his house."No, the sentence is not correct. The personal pronoun 'him' is the objective form used as the subject of the verb 'were playing'.The correct subjective pronoun is: "John told us that he and Scott were playing at his house."
Is my mother dislikes cats and won't let mine in the house a compound?
This is not a compound sentence. However, it could be reworded to, "My mother will not let my cat in the house because she dislikes them," to sound more grammatically correct.
Is he tours the house a correct grammar?
"He tours the house" is a grammatically proper sentence, but it would normally include an adverb of repetitious time, such as "frequently", at the end of the sentence as given. If the reference is to a single incident, it could be expressed more idiomatically in the present progressive tense as "He is touring the house."
Do the sentences given in the Discussion Area on this question have the same meaning?
1. He lives in the house across the road.The above sentence is correct grammatically.2. He lives in the house over the road.The above sentence is INcorrect grammatically. You can cross over the road, but the house is not 'over' the road. If a house was 'over' a road, the house would be hovering above the road.3. He lives in the house across the street.The above sentence is correct grammatically.4. He lives in the house over the street.This is the same as question #2. A house is not 'over' a street or road.5. I saw the children wandering slowly across the road.The above sentence is correct grammatically.6. I saw the children wandering slowly over the road.For the same reasons as #2 and #4, the above is INcorrect.7. I saw the children wandering slowly across the street.The above sentence is correct grammatically.8. I saw the children wandering slowly over the street.For the same reasons as #2, #4, and #6, the above is INcorrect.9. I was fortunate to get across the road without being knocked over.The above sentence is correct grammatically.10. I was fortunate to get over the road without being knocked over.For the same reasons as #2, #4, #6, and #8, the above is INcorrect.11. I was fortunate to get across the street without being knocked over.The above sentence is correct grammatically.12. I was fortunate to get over the street without being knocked over.For the same reasons as #2, #4, #6, #8, and #10, the above is INcorrect.Consider the differences in following correct sentences:I could only walk across the street by jumping over the potholes.He lives in the house across the road, but with a jetpack invention he could travel over the road to my house.Over means above, not on the surface. So I can't walk 'over' a street or road.I can walk along, down, up, or across a street or road.
Which sentence is correct 'you drove pass his house' or 'you drove past his house'?
The correct sentence is "you drove past his house." The word "past" is used to indicate movement beyond or beside something, while "pass" is a verb meaning to move by or beyond something.
Which sentence is correct you drove pass his house or you drove past his house?
The correct sentence is "You drove past his house." "Past" is used as a preposition to indicate movement beyond something, while "pass" is a verb indicating action.
What is the error in the sentence these days your house is under repairs?
the correct sentence is the house is under repair.
Can at be the first word of a sentence?
Yes, "at" can be the first word of a sentence for a grammatically correct sentence. Usually, at is used to start a subordinate clause. A subordinate clause is the part of a sentence that isn't correct all by itself. An example of a subordinate clause is "At my house". Notice that the previous sentence is a fragment. It is a subordinate clause. However when you add an independent clause, (the part of a sentence that is correct all by itself) you have a grammatically correct sentence. An example of a grammatically correct sentence that includes a subordinate clause is "At my house, my friend lost his tooth". In almost all cases, at can be used to start a sentence. Use your common sense or ask a teacher, etc. to find out when using "at" to start a sentence is incorrect. For your help, I will write some examples of when using "at" to start a sentence is correct, and when it is incorrect.Correct:-At a mountain I saw an experienced hiker climbing without safety equipment.-At soccer practice I scored a goal.Incorrect:-At the park. (Fragment)-At the football game.(While the two incorrect sentences could be used as answers to questions, they are fragments, which makes them grammatically incorrect.)Having trouble with my description of subordinate and independent clauses? I have given you some examples of both to clarify. The words in italics are the subordinate/independent clauses.Subordinate Clauses in Sentences:At a mountain I saw an experienced hiker climbing without safety equipment.The subordinate clause in the previous sentence was "At a mountain".Independent Clauses in Sentences:At a mountain I saw an experienced hiker climbing without safety equipment. The independent clause in the previous sentence was "I saw an experienced hiker climbing without safety equipment".Note that in most cases, English teachers would prefer the independent clause to be at the beginning of the sentence as this makes the sentence clearer to the reader.
Which sentence is correct- John and you bought a house or You and John bought a house?
John and you bought a house
Which sentence uses the correct homophone?
He caught a cold from the draft coming in the window. This sentence uses the correct homophone.
Casa fiesta what does this word mean?
Casa - House/home Fiesta - party However "Casa Fiesta" is not grammatically correct to mean "House party". It would mean something like "House of party"
