answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: To critique scientific arguments and increase the validity of scientific evidence scientists?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?

Yes it is true that scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence. For a hypothesis to have value, it must be testable is true also.


How did the scientific change the way scientists did their work?

they relied more on evidence


Scientists use to organize questions and reach conclusions that are backed by scientific evidence and research?

the Scientific Method


How did the scientific revolutions change the way scientists did their work?

They relied more on evidence.


How did the scientific revolution changed the way scientists did their work?

They relied more on evidence.


Why do scientists record details about scientific observations?

to provide evidence that supports conclusions.


How did the scientific revolution change the way scientists did their work?

They relied more on evidence.


When are scientific ideas modified-?

Scientific ideas are modified when evidence is found that does not fit the predictions. The scientists determine why and revise the model to fit the new data.


If new evidence does not support a scientific theory scientists will most likely?

modify the theory or discard it altogether.


Advantages of scientific research?

Scientific research provide factual evidence to questions that scientists have. The research can lead us closer to mysteries about the world and galaxies.


A physical representation of an atom is an example of a scientific?

If new evidence does not support a scientific theory, scientists will most likely


What are the arguments for and against DNA evidence?

There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.