The Second Great Awakening built upon the core principles of the First Great Awakening, emphasizing personal salvation, emotional worship, and individual piety. However, it also introduced new elements such as a focus on social reform movements and missionary work. Overall, the Second Great Awakening can be seen as a continuation and expansion of the religious fervor of the First Great Awakening.
Yes, religious movements played a significant role in the abolitionist movement by promoting moral arguments against slavery based on religious beliefs. Religious leaders and organizations like the Quakers and various Protestant denominations were active in advocating for the abolition of slavery, helping to mobilize support for the cause. Their influence helped to shape public opinion and create a moral imperative for the abolition of slavery.
A secularist is someone who believes in the separation of religion and government. They advocate for a society where public institutions are free from religious influence and individuals are able to practice or not practice religion as they choose.
Did even the Shakers achieve that? To the extent which Shakers achieved it, which is to say to the extent which some small set of fervent believers band together to create a community which they largely believe is following principles they all believe, well that kind of thing (whether you call it a cult or a community) happens all over the place. Consider monastic orders such as the Benedictines, which have existed for hundreds of years. Everyone's utopia is different, but you can find small groups close enough to agreement to make it work, sometimes for much longer than Shakers.
The word icon comes from the Greek language. Icons are sacred or holy images particularly venerated by the Eastern Rite churches and to a smaller extent by the Roman Catholic Church. The destruction or damaging of these images is called "iconoclasm" (in Greek 'image breaking'). A person who commits such an act of sacrilege is referred as an "iconoclast". Iconoclasm most often refers to the destruction of images within one's own culture as a result of political or religious disorder. For example, if the military forces of one country destroyed the sacred images or statuary of another, one would call that sacrilege.
No, Ignatius of Antioch is not in the Bible. He was an early Christian theologian and bishop who lived in the first and second centuries AD. His writings are considered to be important early Christian texts, but they are not included in the canon of the Bible.
Reference the great awakening and the mingling of races... for a third, I'm not sure... to what extent: people could worship or not worship as they pleased. Answer Consider that the colonies had a good number of folks who wanted out from under the religious oppression of England. They became more tolerant because they'd had it done to them, and because they wished to apply the golden rule.
Yes, the Aztecs did perform human sacrifices. It was a central part of their religious beliefs and rituals. Sacrifices were performed to honor their gods and ensure the continuation of the world and the prosperity of their civilization.
they didnt tolerate religious freedom. anyone who believed in a different god was kicked out.
they didnt tolerate religious freedom. anyone who believed in a different god was kicked out.
Well it was a continuation of past US expansionism because the US still believed that they had a God given right to expand, take what they could, and purify the culture (very similar to thoughts of manifest destiny), and the US wanted to expand their economy and power throughout the world. The difference was that instead of expanding within the confines of America they began national expansion into places such as the Philippines.
The latitudinal extent of india influences the duration of day and night in india. The second reason even i dont know.
I doubt it. It wasn't really mentioned to much extent until the second book.
It depends on the legislation of the country you live and to some extent also on your religious beliefs.
We can not say extent here because Labour Front did have a second merdeka talk.
The Ku Klux Klan and similar white supremacy groups were not a continuation of the US Civil War. They were formed by former Confederates who wished to terrorize Black Americans, kill them and any Republican supporters they could find. To a certain extent their goal was to bring back Democrat Party control of Southern states.
It depends entirely on the extent of the damages.
In his writings, Thomas Jefferson constantly plagiarized the writings of Roger Williams, the founder of Rhode Island and the Baptist Church in America. These writings on freedom and respect for the individual were spread by the great awakening. In fact, listening to many of the evangelists present the statements of Roger Williams was the equivalent of listening to the writings of Thomas Jefferson. While England had a Great Awakening at the same time, the two were different. America took from the English movement. America also took from Roger Williams. England did not take anything from America. Thus, the preachers popularized the ideas that would enable America to accept self government and self responsibility. Other nations have adopted self government but have failed because the people have not accepted self responsibility. There was no great awakening.