Total war is all out war; using all weapons available. The Korean War and Vietnam Wars were not total wars; they were LIMITED wars...limited to non-nuclear conventional weapons. Total wars can no longer be fought in this age of atomic weapons, without risking "mutually assured destruction."
It's called Total War.
Germany :)
Sherman was the first to wage war on both civilians & military aspects of the nation Sherman was the first to wage war on both civilians & military aspects of the nation Sherman was the first to wage war on both civilians & military aspects of the nation
No. The British-Japanese Pact of 1902 required that no outside foreign nation intervene in the war. If any foreign nation interfered then Britain would enter the war on Japan's side. The war was to be fought strictly between Russia and Japan.
Total war means that everyone in the nation is fully involved in the war. Also that everyone has to sacrifice something for the war. An example for that is rationing, because everyone had to eat less food in order to be able to ship stuff overseas.
Most nation´s fell that total war is acceptable because everyone uses it. Some examples - The atomic bomb, Horishima - World War II Without total war the U.S. would not exist Harvard graduate James
The war that split the Iroquois nation in to factions was the Revolutionary War. The Iroquois nation lived in the Northeast coastal region.
England was the nation with which Spain went to war.
If the US declared war on another nation, it would imply a war to win total victory, which in turn implied using any weapon or means necessary to accomplish that goal (within the rules of war).
No nation is at war with Iraq. Trying to establish law, order, and stability to the nation.
VN was one nation.
The war left the nation with a debt of about $27 million.