It does not matter what state your in. No one is liable for an act of nature.
Your neighbor is responsible for the portion on their property and you are responsible for the portion on your own property.
It is generally not legal to cut tree roots from a neighbor's tree on your property without their permission. Doing so could harm the tree and potentially lead to legal consequences. It's best to discuss the issue with your neighbor and seek a mutually agreeable solution.
Depends if the fence line IS the property division line, in which case both homeowners have to agree about the trimming. If whatever needs trimming is solely on your property you are allowed to do whatever it is you need to do, providing any homeowner association (if they exist) has rules for this.
There may be local ordinances requiring you to give neighbors notice before taking action. The community may have an arborist who can take action without your even having to be involved. Even if there is no ordinance or arborist, you should give your neighbors notice. And if you wind up having to have it done, think about a qualified arborist because if you kill the tree you may be liable for replacement, and if they die anyway all you need is your neighbor claiming you killed them. Then again since they should be taking care of them and you have to put money out that you're most unlikely to get back w/o a fight (?), talk to them about when they plan on doing something and if it's a question of $ maybe offer to divvy up the cost and/or replace them. No solution is perfect if they are not cooperative....
The two terms are per stirpes and per capita. Per stirpes means the estate is divided among branches of the family based on equal shares per branch, while per capita means the estate is divided equally among all lineal descendants regardless of their branch in the family tree.
It is definitely legal on your private property, it could be considered trespassing on others private property. Schools have their own rules, so they could call it a violation of school rules for students or trespassing for adults, if they ask you to leave or stop. On public property, like parks owned by the city, they could ask you to stop or try to arrest you for reckless endangerment, or if you refuse to come down they could try disturbing the peace or obstructing an officer in his duties, but the only one that could possible hold up in court at all is maybe disturbing the peace, but only if it's actually disturbing people. Really, it's exceedingly unlikely for anybody to make a fuss if a child climbs a tree or an adult helps them, or even decides to go in themselves. If you had problems with somebody stopping you and saying it's illegal, they are most likely lying. The only possible reason for you to not be allowed to climb a tree in public property is if it was endangered or if climbing it would be a danger to you and others.
If the tree was on your property then you are. If it was on theirs , then they are.
you are responsible for your property. with that being said if your tree grows out of control onto your neighbors property then you must pay for the removal and its damaged that is caused.
Legally, the branches of a tree that overhang onto your property still belong to the neighbor. You have the right to trim the branches that cross onto your property up to the property line, but you must ensure not to cause harm to the tree itself. It is best to try to discuss the situation with your neighbor and come to a mutual agreement.
who would ask this question!?? barb
A person with no money can have a tree which is in danger of falling on a neighbor's property by contacting the city in which they live in. They can make arrangements to remove the tree or get them in contact with a company which will donate their services.
NO, Nobody is liable for an act of nature. You would not be liable for damage to vehicle resulting from a falling tree limb. Your neighbors comprehensive auto insurance will cover the damages. You would only be liable if someone had warned you that the branch was dangerous and you took no heed.
The portion of the tree that falls on your property is your responsibility. You can also trim a tree which hangs over your property line but not to the detriment of the tree's health. It is always best if neighbors share in the responsibility of maintaining a tree which covers two properties, but that obviously is not always possible.
Nobody is liable for an act of nature. You are responsible for the portion of the tree that fell on your property. Your neighbor is responsible for the portion of the tree on the neighbors property.
It's your tree.
It is generally not legal to cut tree roots from a neighbor's tree on your property without their permission. Doing so could harm the tree and potentially lead to legal consequences. It's best to discuss the issue with your neighbor and seek a mutually agreeable solution.
Nope... you can trim the branches that overhang your property - but you cannot fell the tree without permission as it's not on your property.
It does not matter who the tree belongs too because neither one is liable for the damage to your car. A property owner is not liable for an act of nature and homeowners insurance does not cover automobiles. Your comprehensive auto insurance will cover your vehicle for damage from an act of nature.