answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Adolf hitler

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Two neighboring farmers are having an argument. Farmer A claims that he should be given half of Farmer B's land. Furthermore if he doesn't get it he'll burn down all of Farmer B's crops! Not wanting?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Two neighboring farmers are having an argument. Farmer A claims that he should be given half of Farmer B's land. Furthermore if he doesn't get it he'll burn down all of Farmer B's crops! Not wanting t?

The appeasement of Nazi Germany


Who is wanting to cut down forests?

the farmers are wanting to cut down forests just for their use.


What is the largest argument between parents and teens?

wanting to go somwhere against your parents will


Who stood to gain the most from Pinckney's treaty?

Farmers wanting to move into the once desputed terrritory.


Who stood to gain the most from Pinckney's Treaty 1795?

Farmers wanting to move into the once desputed terrritory.


What is the internal conflict of the diary of anne frank?

Anne thinking everything she does is wrong due to the grownups' comments about her. Peter always wanting to pick an argument when he talks


What does it mean when your boyfriend puts you against a wall and just stares at you?

If it was during an argument, it probably means he is wanting to hit you. Really hard to give an answer without knowing the situation


What argument do some historians give today for dropping the atomic bomb on japan?

The argument was the words of President who ordered the bombs. He stated that he wanted to end the war and to collapse the means for Japan to make war ever again. There were other facts as to why to drop the bomb but wanting to end the war fell in the first place.


Would you have a argument?

not if it can be avoided at all. Arguments are bad and no-one will win, so just agree passively wherever you can if their are no negative consequences. People just bring up arguments to try and make others respect their opinion. They are not wanting to learn, they are wanting to be important. Let them have what they want if they are that desperate for it. Not that I always follow this advice myself. In truth, my answer is unfortunately usually "Yes".


What is ironic about Atticus's argument with Heck Tate?

The irony in Atticus's argument with Heck Tate is that Atticus, who is known for upholding justice and truth, is in this case unknowingly protecting his own son by wanting the truth of the situation revealed, while Heck Tate, the sheriff, is willing to sacrifice the truth to protect Jem from the consequences of the event. This situation challenges the typical roles of the characters and their values.


Is government borrowing and cost of credit crowding out private sector?

Government is hurting the private sector by not raising the federal budget deficit. It was part of the republican argument in the current clash. The republicans are wanting to cut spending and not raise the taxes.


Do you have to have reason for not wanting to do something or is not wanting to do something an actual reason?

You always have to have a reason for not wanting to do something. Sometimes after telling someone this they are stubborn because they just want to say "they don't want to" whenever they are asked to do something instead of giving an actual reason. Many arguments arise like this and the person who is asking for the actual reason that the person doesn't want to do whatever they are being asked to do is right and should easily win the argument if the other person decides not to be so stubborn.