No, they commonly aren't found guilty. However, if there is a case of homicide, the person in possession of the firearm and of course all possible suspects/accomplices/etc. will be questioned.
For a person to be guilty, someone has to prove with supportive reasons that the person did something wrong.
Weak
once the person was found not guilty that person cannot be tried again for the same offence. This is due to the fifth ammendment.
a murderer?
nothing happens, just hug the person......
That person is guilty of murder
Yes, a jury decides if a person is guilty or not guilty.
The court does not assume that you are necessarily guilty just because you plead guilty; there are many cases of innocent people who plead guilty, usually because of some mental illness. A delusional person may believe that he or she is guilty of something that he or she did not actually do. So, the case is still investigated, the evidence is still examined, and the person who pleaded guilty might still be acquitted. However, a guilty plea does constitute some degree of evidence, and it may lead to a guilty verdict, even for a person who is actually innocent. It depends upon what other evidence is available, and upon the care with which the court is handling the trial. It is unfortunately the case that sometimes the police and the prosecutor are just happy to convict someone, whether that person is guilty or not. It counts as a successful prosecution, that someone is found guilty.
You can but someone who eats the food could get the chicken pox from that person who had the chicken pox that touched the food.
yes you would be found guilty... if the person who slipped you the hallucinogen made you somehow kill someone, then if they were caught and tried, there's a chance they would go to jail too.
the person found guilty
Said person would be an "accessory before the fact" and would be guilty of what ever the perpetrator is guilty of