true
For the most part the South fought the invading North on Southern soil,so Confederate soldiers had that mental/emotional advantage of fighting for their homes. On a purely strategic level the South had the "interior lines", however the under-developed railroad system in the South somewhat mitigated this advantage.
The three main southern seaports that were blockaded during the Civil War were New Orleans, Charleston, and Savannah. The Union Navy aimed to cut off the Confederate states from international trade and disrupt their supply chains, leading to significant economic and strategic consequences for the Confederacy.
For the following reasons: 1 - Tennesse was the point of junction between the Confederate states of the east and the west; 2 - the most important railroads lines connecting the afore mentioned states were running through its territory; 3 - being crossed by the Rivers Tennessee and Cumberland and the Mississippi, which marked its western border, was the main strategic way of penetration into the Confederacy's territory.
In the US Civil War, the North had a larger population and a larger industrial base with which to manufacture weapons. The opportunity of emancipating slaves and recruiting them into the army of the North was also a strategic advantage (as well as a moral advantage).
It allowed the Union and enabled them to control the river systems and to blockade the entire southern coastline.
true
The confederate army had better generals
It was too close to Washington dc for strategic comfort for both the union and confederacy during the civil war.
Instead of the frontal assault, Lee could have attempted to gain a tactical advantage through maneuver, or broken off the battle to seek a strategic advantage at another place and time. Lee had the advantage whenever he was fighting on his home turf.
The battle ended in a stalemate, although the tactical advantage seemed to be on Confederate side. But Grant's decision to slip southward towards Richmond turned to be a strategic advantage for the Union, because the undetected movement outbalanced Lee who was compelled to follow the Federal Army giving in to Grant's strategic initiative.
Having control of Vicksburg was a significant advantage for the Union during the American Civil War. Vicksburg was a strategic location on the Mississippi River, and the Union's capture of the city in 1863 allowed them to effectively control and blockade the river, splitting the Confederacy in two. It also provided the Union with a base to launch further campaigns into the Confederate territory.
The battle ended in a stalemate, although the tactical advantage seemed to be on Confederate side. But Grant's decision to slip southward towards Richmond turned to be a strategic advantage for the Union, because the undetected movement outbalanced Lee who was compelled to follow the Federal Army giving in to Grant's strategic initiative.
New Orleans was considered strategic because it controlled the Mississippi River.
Competitive Advantage is vital to Strategic planning. Strategic planning identifies strengths and weaknesses and visions and missions for the future. Competitive advantage relys on the benefits of the companies strengths and act upon them to turn them into competitive advantage. Other firms can't duplicate strategy or competivness that they don't have.
During the start-up of the Civil War to the ending of the conflict the Union held a strategic and commanding advantage in terms of quantity of rail lines. The Union held approximately 31,000-miles compared to Confederacy's 9,000. The advance and Confederate captures southward further increased the Union's rail capacity in the North's favor.
It was a stalemate, which Grant was able to transform in a strategic advantage, shifting south towards Richmond, outbalancing Lee, who was forced to hastily follow the Union Army in order to cover the Confederate Capital city.
They were after oil and a strategic advantage.