Technically no. Although he suffered severe losses in some battles, most notably in his conflict with King Porus of India, he held the field in every battle he fought. However if we count his return from India, during which he lost most of his troops to minor battles and deprivation, it is hard not to put this down to a bad loss.
There is some sensible revisionist discussion on, if Alexander had beaten Porus, with help from the King of Taxila, why did he:
a. Sign a peace treaty with Porus, under which Porus retained his kingdom.b. Cede his ally's kingdom of Taxila to Porus.c. Thereafter act as an instrument of Porus in securing his territories for him.d. Remove himself from Porus' territories, and then go home.Speculative, but the scenario has all the signs of Alexander not defeating Porus - either a standoff at best or a loss.
Comment:
We have third-hand a version of the treaty which was explicit that Porus was under the rule of Alexander and not a sovereign kingdom as it was before the battle. Also Porus paid tribute to Alexander a (undifined) number of chariots and 1,000 of the most prominent people of the kingdom as guests/hostages (Alexander allegedly freed the people but kept the chariots (what did he want obsolete chariots for?). Furthermore Porus was obligated to provide troops if there was a call to arms.
Response:
The validity of that version depends on whether it was or was not a cover up Propaganda. We have no primary evidence of this Treaty. All we can do is compare all the evidence and question the gross inconsistencies above, which read like a cover up. I have no firm opinion either way, but a strong doubt must exist to anyone other than someone irrevocably committed to preserving Alexander unblemished. That latter position is not history.
Yes,
Alexandra the great was badly defeated by the Strong Indian King "Porus"
Infact he was the first Indian king who faced the Alexandra. The loss to Alexandra army was so bad he ran away and settled in Babylon.
Greek scholars intentionally hided this truth to glorify Alexandra.
Indian was in Golden period in those days. The economy, army , sociology, Law everything was just on top.
no he didnt
Yes he did. He was defeated by Vercengetorix at the Battle of Gergovia during the Gaulic Wars. He was also nearly defeated at the Battle of Munda during the Roman Civil War by Sextus Pompeius.
Allegedly never, however his conduct towards King Porus after the battle of Hydaspes looks suspiciously like it was either a defeat or a standoff. He 'gave' Porus back his kingdom, and threw in the kingdom of his own ally the king of Taxila for good measure, then undertook a war to secure Porus' kingdom for him. The official account glosses over this as being Alexander's generosity to a foe, something totally absent in his other actions elsewhere towards friends and foes alike.
No, he never lost a battle, although he did suffer heavy losses and many of his troops were killed.
Alexander the great did not die in battle , but some say malaria or the soldiers poisoned him as they wanted to return to Greece.
Yes, Alexander the Great was badly defeated by the Indian King Porus.
Yes
Alexander the Great defeated the Persian empire
No he was not. He died when he was still young.
Alexander the great began his conquest in Macedonia and he defeated the Persians
the Persian were defeated in the year of 334 B.C.E
When Alexander the Great was crowned king he began his campaign to create his empire. He fought and defeated the Persians and extended his empire into India.
The Roman Empire
Alexander the Great defeated the Persian empire
Persian Empire
Alexander the Great .
No he was not. He died when he was still young.
Notably , it was Alexander the great , the king of Macedon who defeated the Persian king Darius the 3rd .
Alexander the Great.
Alexander the great began his conquest in Macedonia and he defeated the Persians
Alexander the Great.
the Persian were defeated in the year of 334 B.C.E
he was called great because he was never defeated in any battle in his entire life.it is only a myth that he was defeated by porus in india..
Yes, he has