No, the anglo-Saxon Chronicles were established by alfred the Great. Within these texts, no mention of Arthur is found. many see this as a sign he didn't exist. But if you look closely, your notice it doesn't give any defeats of the Saxons. so if Arthur was a real man, this book is the last place to look. Though I must say it tells you alot about the Britain Arthur would have grown up in.
It was
No, the anglo-Saxon Chronicles were established by alfred the Great. Within these texts, no mention of Arthur is found. many see this as a sign he didn't exist. But if you look closely, your notice it doesn't give any defeats of the Saxons. so if Arthur was a real man, this book is the last place to look. Though I must say it tells you alot about the Britain Arthur would have grown up in.
King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.
The Chronicle - 2001 The King Is Undead 1-20 was released on: USA: 8 March 2002
King Arthur was king of Britain
king arthur was nice and overprotective
king arthur
No. There are no records of a King Arthur in England, certainly not in Anglo-Saxon England.
Arthur established order in a time of chaos, but things did eventual turn back into chaos. Arthur was also very naive. He had great intentions, and the went well at first, but it was overall failure. As a hero i think he was epic, because how hard he tried, but he made a bad king.
king Arthur's not real
Sir Kay is King Arthur's foster father's son and King Arthur's knight.
King Arthur is a legendary figure, and whether he actually existed and made laws is a matter of debate among historians and scholars. The story of King Arthur is primarily associated with medieval literature and folklore, where he is depicted as a wise and just ruler who established a code of chivalry known as the Knights of the Round Table.