it was not a viable target.
___
Auschwitz III (aka Monowitz or Buna) was in fact bombed - because it was a chemicals factory ...
Please also see related question.
In the related links box below, I posted the auschiwitz bombing debate article.
Auschwitz III (Monowitz, aka Buna) was bombed because it produced plastics.
To many lives would have been lost and they did not want to lose any more Jews to Hitler.
There were a couple of minor air raids on the chemicals factory in Auschwitz III (aka Buna or Monowitz).
The camp (Buna aka Monowitz or Auschwitz III) was bombed by the USAAF because it was a chemicals plant.
Auschwitz I Stammlager, Auschwitz II Birkenau and Auschwitz III Monowitz
It had 3 sections. Auschwitz-I, which served as a working camp. Auschwitz II-Birkenau, the death camp. Auschwitz-III, it was used to provide slave labor to the nearby industry.
Auschwitz was never bombed by the allies before, during of after the liberation.
To many lives would have been lost and they did not want to lose any more Jews to Hitler.
There were a couple of minor air raids on the chemicals factory in Auschwitz III (aka Buna or Monowitz).
The camp (Buna aka Monowitz or Auschwitz III) was bombed by the USAAF because it was a chemicals plant.
The camp (Buna aka Monowitz or Auschwitz III) was bombed by the USAAF because it was a chemicals plant.
NOBecause, Auschwitz was filled with Inmates constantly so if they allies bombed Auschwitz. So once the allies bombed Auschwitz and it subcamps, they would of killed atleast 500,000+ Inmates along with 2,000 SS Guards and other Staff working at Auschwitz which was part of the Nazi or the SS. Once this happens, Likiely that countries like USSR and China would likely to join Axis because, they wouldn't want to be part of an group which killed Hundreds of Thousands of people just to stop other people getting murderd. Also, the Allies would have been procicuted by the EU and UN after the war for Crimes against Humanity and likely to get fined.YESBecaise, Auschwitz was an network of Death Factories which killed 4.25 Million people including 1.3 Million Jews. It's likely what governments would say is that if they Bombed Auschwitz then either; 1. The Nazis would Stop the Holocaust and the processing of Mass murders. 2. It would show the weakness in the Nazi ideal for an Pure Germany, so other neutral and Axis countries like Sweden and Italy would join or atleast ingage with the Attacks from the Western and Eastern Front. You cant win a war without killing inocent people, so for every civilian dead is an point closer to Victory.
Auschwitz I Stammlager, Auschwitz II Birkenau and Auschwitz III Monowitz
Auschwitz Birkenau was established at Auschwitz but Auschwitz is now called Oświęcim.
Auschwitz I- Birkenau
It is not a simple answer, and one that is filled with conjecture and opinion. Here is mine: No: - if they bombed the railway line then the victims would just have had to march further. - if they had bombed the camp and breached the fences, then the inmates would have had nowhere to escape to. - if they had hit any of the crematoria, then they just would have re-opened the 'bunkers' and used cremation pits instead.
No, the word bombed is not an adverb.The word bombed is actually a verb and a noun.
It had 3 sections. Auschwitz-I, which served as a working camp. Auschwitz II-Birkenau, the death camp. Auschwitz-III, it was used to provide slave labor to the nearby industry.