answersLogoWhite

0

Was Auschwitz bombed

Updated: 8/23/2023
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Best Answer

it was not a viable target.

___

Auschwitz III (aka Monowitz or Buna) was in fact bombed - because it was a chemicals factory ...

Please also see related question.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

In the related links box below, I posted the auschiwitz bombing debate article.
Auschwitz III (Monowitz, aka Buna) was bombed because it produced plastics.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was Auschwitz bombed
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

The bombing of Auschwitz?

Auschwitz was never bombed by the allies before, during of after the liberation.


Why was Auschwitz not bombed?

To many lives would have been lost and they did not want to lose any more Jews to Hitler.


Which concentration camps were bombed?

There were a couple of minor air raids on the chemicals factory in Auschwitz III (aka Buna or Monowitz).


In the book night who bombs the camp at buna?

The camp (Buna aka Monowitz or Auschwitz III) was bombed by the USAAF because it was a chemicals plant.


Who bombs the camp at buna in the book night?

The camp (Buna aka Monowitz or Auschwitz III) was bombed by the USAAF because it was a chemicals plant.


Should Allied forces have bombed Auschwitz?

NOBecause, Auschwitz was filled with Inmates constantly so if they allies bombed Auschwitz. So once the allies bombed Auschwitz and it subcamps, they would of killed atleast 500,000+ Inmates along with 2,000 SS Guards and other Staff working at Auschwitz which was part of the Nazi or the SS. Once this happens, Likiely that countries like USSR and China would likely to join Axis because, they wouldn't want to be part of an group which killed Hundreds of Thousands of people just to stop other people getting murderd. Also, the Allies would have been procicuted by the EU and UN after the war for Crimes against Humanity and likely to get fined.YESBecaise, Auschwitz was an network of Death Factories which killed 4.25 Million people including 1.3 Million Jews. It's likely what governments would say is that if they Bombed Auschwitz then either; 1. The Nazis would Stop the Holocaust and the processing of Mass murders. 2. It would show the weakness in the Nazi ideal for an Pure Germany, so other neutral and Axis countries like Sweden and Italy would join or atleast ingage with the Attacks from the Western and Eastern Front. You cant win a war without killing inocent people, so for every civilian dead is an point closer to Victory.


What are the names of the 3 main camps including Auschwitz?

Auschwitz I Stammlager, Auschwitz II Birkenau and Auschwitz III Monowitz


Where was Auschwitz-Birkenau established?

Auschwitz Birkenau was established at Auschwitz but Auschwitz is now called Oświęcim.


Where was the extermination camp Auschwitz?

Auschwitz I- Birkenau


Would lives have been saved in the long run by bombing Auschwitz and why?

It is not a simple answer, and one that is filled with conjecture and opinion. Here is mine: No: - if they bombed the railway line then the victims would just have had to march further. - if they had bombed the camp and breached the fences, then the inmates would have had nowhere to escape to. - if they had hit any of the crematoria, then they just would have re-opened the 'bunkers' and used cremation pits instead.


Is bombed an adverb?

No, the word bombed is not an adverb.The word bombed is actually a verb and a noun.


How many parts did Auschwitz have?

It had 3 sections. Auschwitz-I, which served as a working camp. Auschwitz II-Birkenau, the death camp. Auschwitz-III, it was used to provide slave labor to the nearby industry.