answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was Britain's or France's responce to the economic crisis more effective?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Economics

What Is New Frances Economy Based on?

acording to the frances moneynit was based on fur


Does Frances export coal?

yes they export coal


How the wall street crash led to the Great Depression?

The date was October 24, 1929,it was called Black Thursday. The stock market crashed. The optimistics believed they would recover but soon the numbers proved them wrong. unemployment reached the highest numbers ever where no other country suffered numbers like this except Germany. No one knew how best to respond to the crisis. President Hoover believed the dole would do more harm than good and that local governments and private charities should provide relief to the unemployed and homeless. By 1931, some states began to offer aid to local communities. FDR, then governor of New York, worked with Harry Hopkins and Frances Perkins to begin a direct work relief program. This helped only a very few. By 1932, only 1/4 of unemployed families received any relief. In 1932, only 1.5 percent of all government funds were spent on relief and averaged about $1.67 per citizen. Cities, which had to bear the brunt of the relief efforts, teetered on the edge of bankruptcy. By 1932, Cook County (Chicago) was firing firemen, police, and teachers (who had not been paid in 8 months). Breadlines and Hoovervilles (homeless encampments) appeared across the nation. Those hurt the most were more stunned than angry. Many sank into despair and shame after they could not find jobs. The suicide rates increased from 14 to 17 per 100,000. Protest that did occur was local, not national: "farm holidays," neighbors of foreclosed farmers refusing to bid on farms at auction, neighbors moving evicted tenants' furniture back in, and local hunger marches.Resistance to protest often turned violent. In 1932, four members of the Dearborn hunger march were shot and killed when 1,000 soldiers accompanied by tanks and machine guns evicted veterans living in the Bonus Army camp in Washington, D.C.FDR, after assuming the presidency, promoted a wide variety of federally funded programs aimed at restoring the American economy, helping relieve the suffering of the unemployed, and reforming the system so that such a severe crisis could never happen again. However, while the New Deal did help restore the GNP to its 1929 level and did introduce basic banking and welfare reforms, FDR refused to run up the deficits that ending the depression required. Only when the federal government imposed rationing, recruited 6 million defense workers (including women and African Americans), drafted 6 million soldiers, and ran massive deficits to fight World War II did the Great Depression finally end. This is only a resumen of the story how the Stock market crash lasted for long hard years. sources: Leuchtenburg, William E. Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, 1932-1940. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1963, passim. McElvaine, Robert S. The Great Depression: America, 1929-1941. New York: Times Books, 1993, passim.


Is there a relationship between the trade deficit and the change of GDP from year to year?

Yes, certainly. The reason that a trade deficit happens is that slave labor exists in places with an over-population problem, weak pollution laws that are not enforced, little or no freedom, low standards of living, no social justice for working people, and the situation is exploited by rich tycoons and bankers who dominate the broken commercial Babylonian system that we use today. Money to finance foreign slave labor factory production of goods comes from 3 sources. 1. Money created from nothing (fiat currency) that is provided to a government contractor. The money is largely created from nothing because the US government does not receive enough tax money to pay for all of its government expenditures--a large yearly deficit usually happens. This shortcoming in the budget must be borrowed at interest by issuing of federal treasury notes to the US Federal Reserve Banking system (the Fed). The Fed independent from government (private corporation) sets the US interest rates and the rate at which various types of money are injected into the American economy. Upon the receipt of these T-bills, the Fed issues credit (computerized money in bank accounts) upon which the government can issue government checks. A study was carried out by US President Ronald Reagan to determine the revenue expenditure situation for taxes and the budget. Wikipedia:> The Private Sector Survey on Cost Control (PSSCC), commonly referred to as The Grace Commission, was an investigation requested by United States President Ronald Reagan, in 1982. The focus of it was waste and inefficiency in the US Federal government. The report said that one-third of all income taxes is consumed by waste and inefficiency in the federal government, and another one-third escapes collection owing to the underground economy. "With two thirds of everyone's personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt and by federal government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services [that] taxpayers expect from their government."< The deficit between government budget expenditure versus tax revenue is borrowed from the Fed. The Fed, it could be convincingly argued, owns and runs the USA, and that all US federal employees are actually paid directly as Fed employees and not as employees of the people / tax payers of the USA. It is therefore little wonder why so many laws are passed that mistreat the people / tax payer in favor of rich Wall Street or international banking tycoons. A federal grant or loan can be issued via check to successful applicants who might then turn around and invest the money to build more factories in China or India to manufacture goods there. 2. Money created from nothing (fiat currency) that is issued by any private bank issuing a loan to a person or business who provides the issuing creditor bank with a promissory signature to repay the loaned monies. Before the loan is made, the money does not exist. Banks can create money out of nothing except a computer accounting program running on their computers. The rules governing the behavior of banks states that they must have deposits or reserve funds equal to or exceeding 1/10 th to 1/20 th the amount of money that they issue as loans. This is known as unsound money or fractional reserve banking. The 1/10 th to 1/20 th fraction is known as the reserve fraction that banks must follow or be in breach of the laws and subject to fines or closure of their bank charters (permits to operate in the USA). 3. Investors can pool existing earned, stolen, drug money laundered cash, and borrowed money together to invest in companies listed on the major stock exchanges to build and run the foreign factories. The historical phases of the growing trade deficit problem can be summarized as follows: a) Rich tycoons and their scholarly think tank groups recognized an opportunity to exploit low wage, overpopulated countries to make even more money so that the slaves wasted their lives (time on Earth) working hard while the tycoons did no work at all. Thereby, enslavement is the wasting of other peoples time and effort at little or nearly no cost for the masters and little or no benefit to the slaves. b) Rich tycoons and their think tank groups lobbied government legislators to change the laws to permit foreign made goods from slave labor countries have zero import duties, and no other forms of import taxes applied to them, opening up the borders of the country to free trade. This happened with the North American Free trade agreement, and with most favored nation status for China being granted some years ago. c) The legislated statutes were updated with the changes demanded by the tycoons even though this meant that almost all manufacturing jobs in America would be lost to lower wage factory workers overseas, and duties and import taxes on goods from such low wage nations would no longer be available as a revenue stream for the US government. The reasons for this was that "free trade capitalism" was portrayed as a healthy choice that would not ruin the economy because resilient American know-how would quickly make structural adjustments so that other forms of work would come into existence some how (magic?). Voters and the American mass media did not make any issue of free trade significantly enough to defeat those politicians praising its virtues (like short term lower prices). This may be due to the lack of critical thinking to question the information being provided and seek truthful answers that are fully reasoned in clear steps. Prior to the 1913 Federal Reserve and IRS Federal Income Tax acts in the USA passed by US President Democrat Woodrow Wilson, a fan of J.P. Morgan and John D. Rockefeller, federal government funding was entirely provided by import duties and export taxes on manufactured goods. d) Initially when the laws changed permitting freer trade, everyone was happy because no American factory jobs had been lost yet and new inexpensive goods were being sold in the stores--made in China or India. e) The sales of more expensive, higher quality American made goods went way down, and the inventory of these goods would not go down except if the retailers put the goods on sale for a loss--so no new orders for American-made goods were placed by the supply channels for the retail stores. f) With the sales and factory orders dropping to near zero levels for American made goods, the American factories had to stop production and close down, laying off all of the millions or tens of millions of workers who were earning good wages. One by one factories manufacturing different types of goods were closed down. At one point all sorts of products were made in the USA (TV sets, radios, furniture, clothing, computers, microscopes, dishes, kitchen appliances), but now this is rarely the case. In an effort to lower product costs the foreign manufacturers cut the quality and durability of their products (using the lowest quality of plastics) until there was a backlash when US consumers noticed that some goods were still being made with at least some level of quality while the newer stuff from certain companies was junk that would break and have to be thrown away in the garbage or returned to the store because it never worked in the first place. These garbage goods contributed to large amounts of pollution in the form of land fill and incinerator burned junk. g) Retailers like Wal*Mart started to prefer that domestic companies move their production to manufacturing plants from Mexico to places like China in order to lower product prices further so that Wal*Mart would attract more low price seeking shoppers (nearly everyone who was out of a job who had little money to spend were placed in this category / situation). When most people are out of well paying manufacturing jobs, or shipping of manufactured goods, or providing service to the manufacturing or transportation providers, GDP was reduced. More and more of the US economy has become a pyramid that supports the US federal government programs. As such the economy and business has transformed into a service economy. This is known as tertiary industry economy. A primary industry is fishing, mining, farming, and logging (resource based economy--selling off unrefined, raw materials to other countries who would process the products into salable retail products packaged to sell on store shelves). Secondary industries are manufacturing production like computer manufacturing, IC chip manufacturing, chemical plants, etc--exactly the kind of jobs that were exported out of the USA by order of the business tycoons, bankers, and government free-trade advocates (stooges of the tycoons). With reduced levels of employment, certain regions of the US have suffered greater amounts of crime because otherwise honest people are having to do anything that they can to survive without jobs. Low incomes (working poor) are a source of crime because such family units whose head of the household cannot afford to buy the family decent food to put on the table has to do something to provide for their family, or otherwise they might suffer malnutrition or starvation. Daughters or sons might turn to crime to have a better standard of living and nice things to own. Seeing no future for themselves, a desperate youth might commit suicide, and might certainly reconsider whether the effort of going to college or university was worthwhile when no jobs to speak of were available. One of the founding fathers of the US constitution said that the US was unlikely to fall from foreign forces landing on the shores, rather some insiders who hijack the issuing of money would cause its downfall. Mention of a standing army is given. Interestingly, a standing army is completely different than a part time volunteer army in several ways. A standing army has no other job than attacking or defending all of the time, whereas a part time, volunteer army assembles to fight or defend when needed. This difference means a huge cost difference in the economy of the given country. A standing army costs a lot of money that drains the economy without any production of goods or services to show for the expenditure. A foreign financial interest with huge money supply could fund an enemy force for show in order to force the defending country into needless military spending that drains their economy of all of their GDP output. To destroy an economy it is only necessary to scare the population into needless military, defense, and security spending. Hitler said that propaganda involving patriotism could be cited to ridicule any opposition to military spending and lots of security measures and reduced freedoms. The same was done by successive presidents over the last 100 years. Wars all over the place are being fought for no other good reasons than to cause rapid social changes in human society by the groups who promote the order out of chaos theory of human development. During these times of rapid change, it gives these groups an opportunity to seize further political and economic power over the rest of the population. It is also good to keep in mind that since the 1700s, the idea has been promoted that the world is over populated. The Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus FRS (13 February 1766 - 23 December 1834) was a British scholar, influential in political economy and demography. He influenced Charles Darwin, Sir Frances Galton, Wedgwood, Huxley, and all subsequent genocidal, eugenics loving population control enthusiasts like Ford, Rockefeller, Watson, Sanger, Kissinger, Gates, etc. See the video >wicked billionaire's depopulation club< and anything closely related. With wars, such philanthropists could contribute to war production while enjoying the depopulation effects of wars. When the economy is very poor, military service seems a viable career opportunity unless the nation is bent on war efforts somewhere far off and unimportant. The elite rich always seem to have multiple purposes for promoting wars and military conflict and empire building. In many places where the US military has been sent, illegal drugs are sure to be found. Vietnam (Air America), Iran Contra Nicaragua (Oliver North), and lately Afghanistan. The drugs are cocaine, and heroine. Invariably the production and shipment of illegal drugs increases and the product finds its way to US cities and streets. The money ends up being laundered by the CIA through large corporations listed on the major stock markets because these corporations are exempt from the laws that govern the shipment of large quantities of cash money otherwise that would be considered the proceeds of crime involving drug money laundering. Laws concerning the CIA have been updated so that field level agents are no longer considered CIA employees in order to avoid drug charges being laid against the agency even though these people are paid salaries by the CIA. Micheal Rupert and others have reported decades of CIA involvement in the illegal drug trade at the street level in the USA. See video >Michael Ruppert Truth and Lies of 9-11< See >Gene Chip Tatum< See >Gary Webb report in the Mercury News CIA drug< What happened after the mistake of "completely free trade" was recognized?--Well it still may not be recognized as a mistake or problem that there are no more manufacturing jobs--even after years of stagnant GDP performance and greater levels of poverty and lower standards of living. This is because the politicians live in a different world because they are able to vote themselves pay raises. Their reasoning may also be that tax money revenue collected from personal income taxes is too small so that most of the country's money now comes from the privately owned Federal Reserve Banking system so that the politicians see themselves as employees of the banking tycoons who own the Fed, and do whatever is asked of them from the tycoon's scholarly think tank group (CFR, Trilateral Commission, etc). The situation is more serious than almost all people think because independent investigators over the past 30 years have found that election balloting is rigged. If the elections are rigged, are we living in a democracy or some kind of fascist state run by leading tycoons who operate most of the major businesses in America (or maybe foreign corporations)? The books by these authors were suppressed. The authors were the late Collier brothers who each mysteriously, coincidentally "woke up dead" a few years ago. The book that they wrote was "Votescam: The Stealing Of America." The brothers were both freelance reporters. They cooked up and pitched a story idea to their newspaper editor or book publisher about the experience of running for office in an election. Through their investigation and story development they encountered huge amounts of election fraud being done by the people managing the election results. They initially didn't know it was happening until they realized that the local TV and Radio news media predicted the entire election results down to within a couple of votes for the entire district that they had entered for election--this only after a few minutes after the polls closing when the results had not even been properly counted at all. They asked themselves how could this have been done? It was too coincidental that with so few exit polling results that the final vote count would be so accurately projected by the news media computer systems tallying the results. Another thing that they found was that exit polling results were coming in constantly throughout the election day during a particularly cold winter in one of the Northern states where the pattern of voters coming into the voting places was either early in the morning before work or at the end of the work day just after work to avoid extra traveling in the very cold winter weather. The ongoing, accurate exit polling results just did not jibe with the human behavior pattern of the voters of the district for that day. So they decided to investigate this more fully by examining the sequence of events and found paper ballots being destroyed and put into the garbage, and other similar practices. They got cameras and took pictures of large numbers of women from The League of Women Voters stuffing the ballot boxes with fake votes (or similar such activities during a recount?) The League of Women Voters are supposedly the ones who hold those Presidential Debates. Curious, though, they did not want Republican Ron Paul to take part in the debates for 2008? There is a Google video interview that was filmed while one brother, James Collier, was still alive entitled, "Votescam: The Stealing Of America by James Collier (Full Version)" Google docid=924514983687454434 The subtitle for the video was "media's partnership & key role in the pshycological tricknolgy used to make people think they have a fair election, when it has been stolen" with the word psychological misspelled by the posting Google video user who had originally uploaded the file. PBS more than 10 years later produced a election fraud documentary that included Bev Harris a housewife with a husband and a couple of kids who discovered that electronic ballots were being counted using both voting machines and tallying central computers that produced fraudulent results. The documentary available on Google videos is entitled "Invisible Ballots" and was produced by PBS. It showed that the major voting machine system manufacturers were deliberately doing election fraud for certain districts for certain parties and certain candidates. One candidate found that when she tried the voting machine and voted for herself, then checked the counting results, her vote was counted for an opposing candidate. This was all caught live on video the day before the election was to take place when an election official was guiding the tour of the voting facility and offered to demonstrate the machines. In the 2000 US Presidential elections, in one district in Florida, something now known as the Volusia error happened. The voting machines had such tampered software that it produced a very high negative valued vote result for one of the candidates. In a place with 600 voters, votes for a obscure Socialist candidate were tallied at 10,000 votes, and this resulted in a set of 16,000 negative votes for Al Gore happening. With this kind of thing happening, it is no wonder that most people think that the Florida result was stolen by agents working for the Bush-Cheney election team. A movie came out about that election, but it failed to mention this glaring criminality on the part of people acting on Bush's behalf. Since that time at least one organization has been formed including Bev Harris that attempts to battle election and vote fraud. Exactly how the major news media are still able to accurately call the results of the vote even with inadequate exit polls is mysterious. There has been criticism and study of just how concentrated the corporate media ownership is in America. The number of stations and networks over the years has steadily declined so that now there are only 4 or 5 major players. With such concentrated ownership, it has indicated that the news reporting has become less and less independent of controlling interest shareholders (tycoons), who then influence heavily the kind and extent of news media coverage for various topics. Reporting of major news events since the early 1900s has been colored by slanted reporting of major news media. One example is that of the Soviet Union leader Stalin. At one point in time the New York Times was praising his policies and positively characterizing him. However, a British reporter was actually on the scene covering the story had a completely opposite story to report. His name was Malcolm Muggeridge, and he reported the horrors of the communist system that had otherwise innocent people / political prisoners carted off to the Soviet Gulag concentration camps in Siberia. By the way, years ago a local news paper where I live reported that the following was a photograph of a gushing natural gas well squirting 50+ feet into the air had frozen solid because the temperature in Siberia where the photo had been taken was at -60 degrees Celsius or -76 Fahrenheit without any wind chill factor taken into account. Google reports that 16 Jan 2008 a temperature of -55 C (-67 F) was recorded in Siberia--so global warming is just not happening to much extent in Siberia--Al Gore--Hide the decline! Such a place could do with quite a lot of global warming before I would move there. Prisoners held in such a place would no doubt perish quite easily and a leader who imprisoned detainees in such a place was probably intent on killing them en-mass. A video about the slanting of the news media then and now can be seen by Google video searching for >behind the big news propaganda and the cfr< The result will be a 60 minute video that gives specific examples, naming names. The docid=6632255652046262625# The presentation is by the conservative group John Birch Society that promotes libertarian ideas, freedom and the US constitution, topics that some goofy people in TV, Wikipedia, and newspapers call "radical ideas." Some people point out that the JBS were funded by the Rockefellers--a family that the JBS supposedly oppose for the Rockefeller's support of global unelected world government elite rich tycoon views that are fronted by the J.P. Morgan / Rockefeller founded group known as the CFR--the very people criticized in the video mentioned above. A full explanation of the Babylonian monetary system is provided by a video entitled "The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control of America" Many other critical videos explain fully the formation and history of the system--Video search >Federal Reserve< then watch as many videos as possible. Various videos by Jordan Maxwell attempt to explain Babylonian and Egyptian symbolism used throughout society. Similarly with the British conspiracy theorist David Icke who claims that alternate dimensional alien reptilian beings are plotting to take over control of Earth. A conspiracy theorist and news media analyst from Austin Texas named Alex Jones routinely explains the critical slants on nearly all breaking headlines, and who might be behind the scenes to orchestrate the news and the laws being proposed and enacted by politicians who don't even bother to read the acts that they are signing into statutes. Google >Fort Knox Gold shipments FDR Nelson Rockefeller Brothers< and you will find an interesting set of articles that supposedly explain how Nelson Rockefeller was actually FDR's boss while he was in office, and supposedly later, the four Rockefeller brothers siphoned shipments of gold out of Fort Knox Kentucky through tunnels engineered by a retired military veteran. One of the ways in which Nelson Rockefeller supposedly avoided being drafted for military service action in WW2 was to have himself appointed by FDR to an important South American war policy advisory position within the US government. In the 1930s during the Great Depression, FDR stole all of the US people's private gold holdings, melted it down into gold bars, put it all on a big railway train, and warehoused it in Fort Knox. In exchange for their gold, FDR gave the people about $16 of virtually worthless paper money printed by the private Federal Reserve Banking system. In a short amount of time gold had increased to $20. When foreign banks transact real money with one another, they ship gold that has inherent value rather than worthless paper. Accusations are still done today that Fort Knox no longer contains the full amount of gold that it should--that most of it was sold during the late 1960s / early 1970s to European bankers. The last full audit of Fort Knox supposedly was done during the Eisenhower administration in the late 1950s, and since then only very cursory inspections of the place have been done and were headed by persons in league with the powerful industrialist bankers who supposedly stole the gold. The more money that consumers spend on goods made elsewhere, the more funds are no longer available for economic sustainability domestically. If the USA threatens to change currencies due to impending hyper devaluation / inflation, the trading countries like China, Japan, and the continent of Europe will be anything but pleased because these places hold trillions of dollars that might become worthless. This situation causes an imbalance bubble that is bound to burst at some point because of the stress that builds in this kind of situation. In recent years Goldman Sachs has engineered the mortgage investment bubble that burst in 2008, causing the credit crunch. Goldman got in early, and managed to get out OK--giving huge bonuses to their managers. Other firms were not so lucky--these were Goldman's competitors: Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, and other banks and insurance companies. Perhaps not so coincidentally, the US Treasury Secretaries have lately been appointed from Goldman Sachs, and may also have been associated with the Fed. Another constant drain on the US economy is the support of the country founded by the Rothschild family / Zionists (1917 Balfour Declaration): Israel. Some claim that the Rothschild family have gold assets buried in bunkers in Germany, Switzerland, France, oil companies, numerous banks including central banks of several countries, and have constructed many buildings and roads in Israel. Because J.P. Morgan was a Rothschild agent in America who sponsored the Rockefeller family, Carnegie, and numerous other robber barons of the late 1800s / early 1900s, the Rothschilds likely secretly own large parts of the Federal Reserve Banking system. Tallying this figure a number of years ago came to 550 Trillion dollars--probably more than half of the worlds entire wealth. And this is the real reason why Zionist interests are a high priority within the CFR run US State Department where it is said that the Middle East section does not have any Arab or Muslim employees--only dual citizenship Israelis are supposedly employed. The various robber barons were against social benefits like a 5 day work week, having various statutory holidays having to be paid, having to pay employees in US currency rather than company script redeemable at the company general store, the 7 1/2 hour or 8 hour day, pollution laws, employment standards laws against discrimination, and numerous others. They would rather prefer indentured servitude from their slaves (employees), but slavery was outlawed years before, and freedom was promised in the US constitutions and its amendments. Social benefits such as those listed above are probably not available in slave wage nations--this suits modern day tycoons fine. Dr. Stan Monteith claims that President Harry Truman had an appointee, the Rockefeller foundation President Dean Rusk who ran some or all of the State department during the time of the Chinese revolution caused the communists to win and the nationalists to lose because of an arms purchase that completed, but that Rusk blockaded the shipment. Conformational reports are coming in on the web: See >Chinese nationalists blockade rifles OR guns communist Dean Rusk Rockefeller< The links indicate that a former US diplomat exposes how US actually helped the communist Chinese instead of KMT. The article links to a Google book entitled "Open Secrets of American Foreign Policy" by Door Gordon Tullock. The subsequent political purges done by the communist Chinese ended up with between 40 and as many as 80 million Nationalist Chinese supporting people killed. This represents many more times the casualties caused by Hitler's Nazis during the Holocaust. This massive loss is never publicized let alone taught in schools that the Rockefeller foundation and the American people who keep them in political power were responsible for many millions killed. See >Mao Zedong purges million wiki< There should be no doubt that what we are taught in school must serve the purposes of the tycoons rather than frustrate it. Science, politics, laws, news that are not in keeping with Rothschild or Rockefeller goals are forbidden. See >TheAntiterrorist on global warming part 1 3< Global warming may be happening, but many have scientific reasons to question why it is that human activity is completely to blame: 1. Volcano CO2 clearly exceeds human production. 2. Warmth from solar cycles warms the oceans that contain CO2 that is released by the warmth and is not the cause of the warming. This is due to the ideal gas laws of partial pressures within a gas or solution. Cold water can hold in solution much more dissolved gas. 3. Water vapor is the greatest green house gas bar none with hundreds of times more influence than trace atmospheric gases. Elimination of water vapor from the oceans is not feasible. 4. In the 1960s or 1970s the Rothschilds and Rockefellers thought of the Club of Rome headed by top officials from Nato that would blame mankind for all the woes of planet Earth. The idea may have come from The Report From Iron Mountain. Later in the 1980s they refined the idea that it was CO2 that was causing a warming trend / climate change. But trees reduce CO2 by extracting it out of the air and at the same time combining the carbon into green plant material. Carbon is an element. The conservation of mass, energy, elements in chemical reactions and physics means that the carbon material that makes up a tree that materializes when logs are burned and turn into charcoal in your fireplace has to come from somewhere and coal and carbon deposits are not plentiful in the topsoil, so all the carbon material comes from the air. In the 1970s the IMF and world bank run by the Rothschilds appointed former US Secretary of State Robert S McNamara as head of the IMF. Where upon, McNamara initiated a plan that funded the burning of the Amazon rain forest, and the planting of food crops by the native peoples there. Unfortunately the soil of the Amazon area is pretty poor and no food crops would grow properly to replace the vegetation of the rain forest trees that were cut and burned by the Rothschild's agent McNamara's keen plan. The Brazil money loans may still have to be repaid with interest to the IMF. So a major engine of oxygen production and carbon reduction from the air was ruined by the very people promoting carbon credit exchange banking systems that supposedly will sponsor clean energy and green environmental initiatives. January 2006 a university professor wrote a scientific paper that claimed that green plants cause global warming. The proof came in the way of a flawed computer model where garbage in created garbage out. Even climate change scientists did not believe that crap. See >plants cause global warming 2006< 5. The science of man made global warming is flawed because proof of the planet warming may be fine--but it does not show causation that humans are directly responsible. CO2 has been many times higher than it is today during very nice periods during the time of the dinosaurs--when obviously there were no people around to pollute the atmosphere with industrial emissions. The Midevil warming period happened during the time of the Vikings when Erik the Red landed on Greenland and so named it because crops would grow where now there are snow covered lands. The Vikings had no means of emitting CO2 to have caused such warming. The cause of global climate change is something called the Sun. Without the sun a greenhouse will become very cold--more so than the surface of Pluto. In fact the air would become so cold that the air would solidify or at least liquefy--a much colder temperature than humans can endure without a space suit. CO2 is a passive Solar collector--the key word is Solar. Without the sun involved, no warming can happen in the first place. In late November 2009 Climate Gate hit the fan. Evidence was present that the scientists were tainting ever piece of data and report that they could get their hands on. Any other scientist publishing findings that contradicted the warming scenario was to be blackballed and the reports discarded from the scholarly and scientific reports and literature--a corrupt scheme that would funnel more funding money into climate science world wide. There was talk of hiding the decline and using tricks to hide temperature data that was not favorable to support the man made global warming religion. Not only that, but it turns out that temperature stations data from around the world were deleted from the records and temperatures from other near cities used via averaging and distance measurements to create false replacement data for the offending cold data that they had deleted from the climate historical record. 6. CO2 and carbon are part of the life cycles of the planet. Green plants are made of carbon. Animal life on planet Earth is known as Carbon based life forms. All oil based fuels are carbon based energy sources. So meat, fruit, vegetables, pavement, and energy sources are all carbon. By taxing carbon, you would be committing suicide by virtually curtailing production of food, of products, and laying off all employees who eat, breath, and use energy. Products must be shipped and so far, unless ships begin sailing again, carbon based fuels will be needed to deliver the products to your doorstep. The purpose of the Club of Rome and "the man-made global warming scam" in its quest to establish sustainable development is actually to de-industrialize the planet and keep the African third world from becoming less dependent and developing its own resources. Because taxation on a global scale has been proposed by governments to combat global warming and carbon pollution, you can bet that the elite rich are going to use this scam money to line their pockets and further enslave the rest of us to have to pay these taxes, when nothing materially will be done to stop poisonous polluters from emitting highly toxic stuff because their companies will purchase a green technology producer permitting the polluter to have carbon credits allowing them to pollute.


Related questions

What has the author Frances Munz Mark written?

Frances Munz Mark has written: 'Characteristics of the literature used by contributers to American and English economic journals'


What has the author Frances Stewart written?

Frances Stewart has written: 'Planning to meet basic needs' -- subject(s): Economic policy, Developing countries, Economic development 'The many faces of adjustment' 'North-South and South-South'


What has the author Frances Brown Dorward written?

Frances Brown Dorward has written: 'Dam greed' -- subject(s): Tennessee Valley Authority, Eminent domain, Economic aspects of Eminent domain, Economic conditions, Social conditions, History


Was Vietnam slaves when the French took over Vietnam?

America was Great Britains colony until 1783. Vietnam was Frances colony until 1954 (with a WWII break in between). Slaves came from Africa.


What has the author Frances J Shaw written?

Frances J. Shaw has written: 'The northern and western islands of Scotland' -- subject(s): Economic conditions, History, Social conditions


Possessive noun phrase for a performance by Frances?

Frances' performance, or Frances's performance.


What kind of animal is Frances in the Frances book?

She is a badger.


What contributed to Frances economic problems prior to the revolution?

Various factors have contributed in France's economic problems prior to the 1789's Revolution, some of the major ones being:Poor agricultural harvestsGrowing costs of the American Revolution (mainly funded by France)Ageing economic system based on social estates


How do you write Frances in Hebrew?

Frances = פראנסס


What is the birth name of Frances Liberace?

Frances Liberace's birth name is Frances Zuchowsky.


What is the birth name of Frances Linden?

Frances Linden's birth name is Frances Martin.


What is the birth name of Frances Langford?

Frances Langford's birth name is Frances Newbern.