Germany and Italy
The Atlantic Slave trade had a distinct correlation to race and agriculture. Also, slavery in the pre-modern world was a casualty of war. If wars raged, the losing side would forfeit citizens to the winning side. They would keep them, and then return them after a certain amount of time. On the Atlantic Slave trade, it was just for forced labor.
poland,italy,belgium,switzerland
When Germany invaded Poland in 1939, France and Britain, who had promised aid to Poland if Germany invaded, entered the war on the Allied side, thus starting the Second World War.
It depended on what side you are on, if you think Germany got what they deserved or not.
Germany
It would be the Axis [Germany, Italy, and Japan].
Antarctica.
Germany was on the Axis side with Italy and Japan
Japan emerged as a world power, but Germany was weak and humiliated
Originally, you can say yes and no. Yes, because originally, Italy was with the Central Powers, who were overrall winning the War effort. Then no, because Italy had switched to the Allies, who were still losing at the time. After the U.S. joined the War on the Allies, Italy was on the winning side by the end.
it is called reparations. now this is most commonly associated with World War 1 when after the central powers were defeated, and in Germany's case particular, were imposed with war reparations this essentially means that the winning side charges the losing side with the cost of the war. this would be like you breaking someone's arm in a fight but the broke both your legs causing you to lose then after they visit you in the hospital and hand you the bill for fixing there arm. in short it is adding insult to injury to the losing side to convince them not to do it again. (worked out great didn't it...)
Japan
Germany and Japan were on the same side in World War II.In World War I Japan was on the Allied side and fought against Germany.
Australian troops were on the winning side
peace and satisfaction
The Winning Side was created in 2003.