Unintentionally, but yes he was. His crimes and the publicity that followed was like a beacon to expose the horrendous conditions that his victims were forced to endure on a daily basis. The wealthier citizens of London, Queen Victoria included, were publicly shamed into action.
But as with most governments, and most social reform, change is slow to appear. Author Jack London for a brief time lived penniless among the impoverished east enders in 1900-01 as research for his book 'People of the Abyss'. At that time conditions were hardly improved from 1888, the time of Jack The Ripper's initial crimes.
To walk the streets of Whitechapel and Spitalfields today, one would barely recognize them as the Whitechapel of the Victorian age. There are still the same streets and alleys that the Ripper stalked his prey, even a few of the buildings remain. The Ten Bells tavern is still in operation and #13 Miller's Court where Mary Jane Kelly was so brutally murdered is part of Ripper Walks for tourists. But the filth and hopelessness of the area has been eliminated, thanks in part, the Jack The Ripper.
Jack the Ripper was an Englishman in 1800's London. Social Security was created in the United States in the 1930's. They are not related in any way or by any means. So, the answer to your question is it didn't.
yes! she is a social reformer
Nobody knows who Jack the Ripper was.
He's not. Jack The Ripper was never identified.
No one was never apprehended as the Jack the ripper.
jack the ripper made his crimes in whitechapel London
toon into casebook jack the ripper and you will get a lot of information.
Jack the ripper is dead his identity remains unknown to this day.
Jack the ripper according to records he existed
Jack The Ripper was never identified or caught.
The Jack the ripper murders as we know, were in 1888. At 5 were attributed to him that year.
I could not find a TV series on Jack The Ripper but there was a 1988 TV movie about the Ripper.