Absolutely. Marshall was a loyal federalist who strongly believed in the value of the Constitution. As Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, he helped ensure the Articles of the Constitution empowered the federal government.
yes he was important.
john marshall
novanet- marshall believed the constitution granted strong federal powers jefferson did not
novanet- marshall believed the constitution granted strong federal powers jefferson did not
novanet- marshall believed the constitution granted strong federal powers jefferson did not
What part of the constitution could he have drawn upon to support his argument
What part of the constitution could he have drawn upon to support his argument
he broadly interpreted the constitution to find implied powers for the national government
Chief Justice John Marshall believed interpreting the Constitution was the responsibility of the Judicial branchof government. The Supreme Court of the United States is the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution.
No. Four members of the US Supreme Court were signatories to the US Constitution, but John Marshall wasn't among them.William PatersonJames WilsonJohn RutledgeJohn Blair
The Anti-Federalists, who were called the Democratic-Republicans, and later the Republicans during Marshall's term of office, were not pleased that Marshall ruled in favor of the United States in cases involving conflicts between the states and federal governments. They also didn't like the fact that Marshall used the Constitution to strip the states of their sovereign authority.
Marshall believed the Constitution implied strong state powers; Jefferson did not.
John Marshall was a Federalist, so he didn't have reservations about federalism. He supported a strong central government with state powers subordinated to the federal government and Constitution.