No. The closest you can get to Camelot and King Arthur being real would be that King Arthur was actually a Roman who grew up in Britain and so later became King of "Camelot" Which probably didn't exist.
:)
No, Arthur would have been king prior to the Norman invasion of 1066 AD, and all of the Crusades happened long after that.
King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.
Merlin was King Arthur's tutor when he was a child.
Arthur, who became King Arthur
King Arthur was the son of Uther Pendragon and Igraine.
Arthur Norman was born in 1917.
Arthur Norman died in 2011.
No, Arthur would have been king prior to the Norman invasion of 1066 AD, and all of the Crusades happened long after that.
Norman Arthur Wakefield was born in 1918.
Norman Arthur Wiegmann was born in 1920.
Norman Arthur Wakefield died in 1972.
Norman Arthur Wiegmann died in 2001.
Norman Arthur Coulter has written: 'Synergetics'
Arthur Norman Wilkins has written: 'The Leonore overtures'
Arthur Norman Exton-Smith was born in 1920.
Arthur Norman Exton-Smith died in 1990.
Yes. He was a Norman. He was the first Norman King in England.