No. In fact he faked his data.
rejected.
Jean- Baptiste Lamarck
Animals should be used for scientific research because their use can save the lives of humans. This type of testing makes it much easier to create medications that are safe for humans.
The idea of acquired characteristics. For instance. The idea that a blacksmith, who would develop enormous muscles due to his trade, could pass these physical attributes on to his children.
If you put it into perspective, Humans can swim, Wolves can swim, are not Werewolf's similar? In my opinion, I would think they can swim, But I don't think there's a scientific explanation that could express my theory, or change it altogether.
superrtitious beliefs about comets and its scientific explanation
superrtitious beliefs about comets and its scientific explanation
scientific explanation is....... wait why am i answering this... i dont know is the answer...
What is the Scientific explanation of Impaired social interaction
Yes, graphs and charts can be a part of a scientific explanation.
Slime grows in the dark scientific explanation through watering, mulching
dgfdgfg
we are the future of the world
if I were to inherit traits based on Lamarcks explanation of evolution were correct we wouldn't be the people we are now. Lamarcks´ explanation was that acquired characteristics were genetically passed to the offspring so if that were so, the human brains would be much more developed, more knowledge, and bigger parts of the body. This question is also tricky since a human would turn out to be a giant by the time they got to the 100th offspring
A scientific theory is an explanation of how the world works answered by the scientific method.
The explanation supported by many experiments is called scientific theory.
There's no "scientific explanation" for that, at least partly because it doesn't happen.