Want this question answered?
The unstoppable influx of Eurasian peoples.
At times during the Roman empire the Germanic tribes within the empire's borders or outside of them, attacked Roman legions or guardposts. Some became part of the Roman military as auxiliaries. Some were trained by the Romans and then used that training against Rome. Finally at the end of the empire the Germanic tribes were some of many barbarians that settled within the old Roman borders. Rome was in the end unable to defeat Germanic tribes in war.
No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.
The first problem was the general decline in literacy and stability that began with the Crisis of the Third Century, in about 235 AD, a period of continual civil wars lasting a couple generations. The second problem was that Roman citizens were more an more inclined to allow themselves to be defended by foreigners. The loyalty of the foreign troupes was badly eroded by the fact that they were badly treated. Eventually, even the highest generals were not Roman. Another problem was that the Germanic peoples on the border of the Roman Empire started to migrate into the empire because they were being attacked from farther out. They formed armies which raided until they finally settled down to form kingdoms of their own. The Roman Empire was formally divided in 286, and this division became permanent in 395. The division left each part rather uninterested in the well being of the other. And the East Roman Empire could not help the West, even if it had the will to do so, because of ongoing wars with the Persians. The 5th century saw a series of weak emperors of the West Roman Empire, most of whom were merely puppets of their Germanic generals. There are people who blame Christianity for making people weak. I think the West Roman Empire had reasons enough without that. The East Roman Empire lasted another thousand years, until 1453, when it was destroyed, after many changes in fortune, by the Ottoman Turks, but that is not referred to as the fall of the Roman Empire. There is a link below to an article on the Decline of the Roman Empire.
Territories of the Holy Roman Empire outside the Imperial Circles was created in 1500.
The "Germania" was written by the Roman historian Tacitus around 98 AD. It is an ethnographic work on the Germanic tribes living outside the Roman Empire.
Tacitus is known as being a historian and Roman senator during the Roman Empire, there are several partial surviving works and writings of Tacitus left such as the Annals and the Histories.
The unstoppable influx of Eurasian peoples.
The Romans looked down on the peoples outside their empire. They called them barbarians (a term borrowed from the Greeks) and saw them as lower civilisations or as uncivilised.
No, it was a monarchy. The empire was tolerant of a wide variety of religions within its borders.
At times during the Roman empire the Germanic tribes within the empire's borders or outside of them, attacked Roman legions or guardposts. Some became part of the Roman military as auxiliaries. Some were trained by the Romans and then used that training against Rome. Finally at the end of the empire the Germanic tribes were some of many barbarians that settled within the old Roman borders. Rome was in the end unable to defeat Germanic tribes in war.
Only one: Israel (the borders were different than today's borders though).
No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.No, although Nero almost bankrupted the empire (he was a big spender and overly generous) the borders of the empire were secure and a peace was negotiated with Rome's perennial enemy, Parthia.
The Roman historian Tacitus is the author of "Annals," a historical account of Rome from the death of Augustus to 70 AD. His work is a valuable source for understanding the political and social dynamics of the early Roman Empire.
There were many historians of the Roman world among them are Seutonius, Tacitus, Dio, Livy, Appian and Paterculus.There were many historians of the Roman world among them are Seutonius, Tacitus, Dio, Livy, Appian and Paterculus.There were many historians of the Roman world among them are Seutonius, Tacitus, Dio, Livy, Appian and Paterculus.There were many historians of the Roman world among them are Seutonius, Tacitus, Dio, Livy, Appian and Paterculus.There were many historians of the Roman world among them are Seutonius, Tacitus, Dio, Livy, Appian and Paterculus.There were many historians of the Roman world among them are Seutonius, Tacitus, Dio, Livy, Appian and Paterculus.There were many historians of the Roman world among them are Seutonius, Tacitus, Dio, Livy, Appian and Paterculus.There were many historians of the Roman world among them are Seutonius, Tacitus, Dio, Livy, Appian and Paterculus.There were many historians of the Roman world among them are Seutonius, Tacitus, Dio, Livy, Appian and Paterculus.
The first problem was the general decline in literacy and stability that began with the Crisis of the Third Century, in about 235 AD, a period of continual civil wars lasting a couple generations. The second problem was that Roman citizens were more an more inclined to allow themselves to be defended by foreigners. The loyalty of the foreign troupes was badly eroded by the fact that they were badly treated. Eventually, even the highest generals were not Roman. Another problem was that the Germanic peoples on the border of the Roman Empire started to migrate into the empire because they were being attacked from farther out. They formed armies which raided until they finally settled down to form kingdoms of their own. The Roman Empire was formally divided in 286, and this division became permanent in 395. The division left each part rather uninterested in the well being of the other. And the East Roman Empire could not help the West, even if it had the will to do so, because of ongoing wars with the Persians. The 5th century saw a series of weak emperors of the West Roman Empire, most of whom were merely puppets of their Germanic generals. There are people who blame Christianity for making people weak. I think the West Roman Empire had reasons enough without that. The East Roman Empire lasted another thousand years, until 1453, when it was destroyed, after many changes in fortune, by the Ottoman Turks, but that is not referred to as the fall of the Roman Empire. There is a link below to an article on the Decline of the Roman Empire.
He consolidated it withing defendable borders.