Yes, because a weak Western Europe (without the Marshall Plan) would be vulnerable to Soviet aggression.
Marshall's economic theories, although very elaborate, have been viewed as eclectic and lacking in internal consistency.
The Soviet leaders probably viewed the Marshall Plan and NATO as direct threats to Soviet security. Soviet leaders felt the United States was using its wealth to buy influence and power in Europe. They feared that strong, rebuilt Western European nations would be a threat to its satellite nations in Eastern Europe.
The Constitution can be viewed at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, PA.
Dick
If the jurisdiction that issued the warrant entered it into the national system, it can be viewed by anyone who does a name search on you.
President Andrew Jackson viewed the National Bank as a curse to the Republic. Jackson believed that a central bank held too much power in controlling the country's money and he felt that it was unconstitutional.
President Andrew Jackson viewed the National Bank as a curse to the Republic. Jackson believed that a central bank held too much power in controlling the country's money and he felt that it was unconstitutional.
A coverslip goes on top of a slide to trap the matter being viewed.
About 1916 with the creation of the National Park Service.
Congress viewed the national road as a military necessity, but it did not take on any other road-building projects.
Politically (and simplistically) speaking, the security equation is viewed as: "Security * Rights = c ( constant)" The more rights individual has; the less security. This statement is arguable and syllogistic, but it's pretty accepted. That said, I think it's a valid generalization that Democrats would sacrifice more security in order to maintain civil and constitutional rights, and more republicans would opt for some limited abrogation of rights in favor of security. This IS a very wide generalization, however.
President Andrew Jackson viewed the National Bank as a curse to the Republic. Jackson believed that a central bank held too much power in controlling the country's money and he felt that it was unconstitutional.