yes because he did it, didn't he?
No
A published document written by a scientist or team of scientists to describe a scientific project - i.e. what they were trying to prove, how they set about it, the results of their experiments and what conclusions they drew.
This is a misnomer. Scientists often and do prove their findings, particularly through repetition of an experiment. Scientists cannot prove a negative (reindeer can't fly), but can only prove such under specific conditions (these reindeer can't fly in March). Theories are not said to be proven until they can fully explain a set of conditions. Even then, parts of a theory can be proven, but the whole remains open to refinement.
Scientific enquiry has a history of leading in unexpected directions. When we venture into the unknown, we do not know where the path will take us. Science does, however, have a well defined and successful method of inquiry, the scientific method, and in that sense it does have a set path.
Angular momentum is one of three distiguishing properties of motion. It being quatized means that it cannot continuously vary, it varies only in quantum leaps between two set values.
If it's well tested, and the results are repeatable, and no contradictions are found,and it makes successful predictions, then you can start calling it a scientific "law".(Even though it's still "only a theory", and it always will be, because it's not possibleto prove it, like the theory that the Earth orbits the sun, and the theory that heatalways flows from hot things to cold things, and the theory that the air in the roomcan never all bunch up in one corner and leave you to suffocate on the other side.)
prove the intersction for crisp set theory
Columbus originally was determined to prove that
That is the definition of a closed set.
prove that every subset of a finite set is a finite set?
What is the timing gear set up for a 1999Ford Transit Van
Barack Obama is successful because he set amazing goals and he defenately achieved them
Use the set buttons.
To prove that he could do anything he set his mind to.
You can set or adjust the clock on a Peugeot Boxer van by pushing on the little buttons below the clock using a pen point.
They are not. They are countably infinite. That is, there is a one-to-one mapping between the set of rational numbers and the set of counting numbers.
Not really. He did not set out to prove anyone wrong. His purpose was to explain things in the light of new discoveries and knowledge.
set on fire