Definitely. Wegener seems to have believed that the continents plowed through the oceanic crust like a ship plowing through water. The geologists of the day couldn't see how that could happen, mainly because it can't.
Eventually, though, they came to realize that what's really happening is that the oceanic crust is moving on its own and carrying the continents with it. That's a lot more rational, but figuring that out required knowing that there are mid-ocean ridges, with lots of volcanic activity; that the oceanic crust is newest at those ridges and older as you get farther away; knowledge of where earthquakes occur worldwide; and many, many other things that we only first encountered in the era around World War II, long after Wegener was dead, and only started to get a real handle on decades after even that.
Although it seemed to make a lot of sense, there was no known proof of HOW the continents would drift. It wasn't until years later that we gained knowledge of plate tectonics, which bolstered Wegener's hypothesis.
One day while scientists were exploring the sea floor, they discovered sea-floor spreading, thus proving Wegener's hypothesis to be correct.
The continental Coastlines fit together like puzzle pieces, fossils, and glacier Grover in warm places
Wegener made a strong case for continental drift as you may know. E.g. similar rock strata on opposing continents, similar fossil types located in geographically distant regions, evidence of glaciation and the general jig-saw fit of the continents. He could not explain however how the continents moved, that is, what force was acting on them and causing them to drift. He suggested that a combination of centrifugal force from the Earth's rotation and gravitational forces from objects in space (similar to what causes tides) moved the continents. Calculations proved this to be impossible. Since he could not explain the mechanism because little about plate tectonics was known at the time, his ideas were not widely accepted in the scientific community.
Pangaea
plate tectonics
His evidence was incorrect.
evidence supporting the idea of sea-floor spreading.
Although it seemed to make a lot of sense, there was no known proof of HOW the continents would drift. It wasn't until years later that we gained knowledge of plate tectonics, which bolstered Wegener's hypothesis.
He could not provide a wholly acceptable explanation for the movement of the continents.
Because Continental drift is when the continents drift apart because they hate each other.
The evidence that supports wegeners hypothesis is the fossil evidence
While geological research during the sixties had shed new light into the theory, it was J. Tuzo Wilson's proposal of a mechanism for continental drift what led to widespread acceptance of the theory. Proposing a feasible mechanism was something Wegener himself had failed to do, he had only proposed some evidence (complementary Coastlines and fossil distributions across continents.) and falsified mechanisms (like Earth's centrifugal pseudoforce).
Because identical fossils were found on two continents far apart, it suggested that at one time the two landmasses were joined together. In other cases of lands separated by far less distance, plants did not propagate across the divide.
Because identical fossils were found on two continents far apart, it suggested that at one time the two landmasses were joined together. In other cases of lands separated by far less distance, plants did not propagate across the divide.
Fossils support his hypothesis.
One day while scientists were exploring the sea floor, they discovered sea-floor spreading, thus proving Wegener's hypothesis to be correct.