0
What else can I help you with?
Did William win the battle of hastings because he had a better equipped army?
well i dont know google it
In the battle of hasting who had a feast before the battle?
The Normans, William the conquerors army, had a feast before the battle.
Was Williams army better equipped?
Yes
Why did William III win at the Battle of the Boyne?
Because his army was trained better and generally better equipped(They had flintlocks and bayonets and James army had muskets and pikes). Plus William III had the blessing of the pope, William and his army used a smart tactic called the Hollow square that James army couldn't get passed. Lastly James men were out number to 3 to 1. Hope this helped
How was Brtish army different from continental army?
The British Army during the American Revolution was better trained and better equipped, but the Continental Army's tactics were better suited for the environment, and they were more emotionally committed to the fight.
Which country has a better equipped army India or China?
In terms of land forces,China. But in terms of navy, India. Overall China is better equipped than India
Who was better equipped in the Battle of Hastings?
The Normans were the better equipped because they brought cavalry horses across the channel in their invasion fleet. The saxon English were fighting on foot and were still recovering from fighting other Vikings in Yorkshire and a 250 march south to meet William.
Was William the Conqueror's army weak?
William the Conqueror's army wasn't weak as he managed to take over other lands and they were well-equipped unlike other armies. This put him at advantage making him more powerful and strong.
How many people were in William wallaces army in the battle of stirling?
William Wallace's army at the Battle of Stirling Bridge in 1297 is estimated to have numbered around 15,000 men. This force included a mix of Scottish nobles, common soldiers, and local militia. The battle was notable not just for its scale but also for Wallace's strategic use of the terrain, which helped his smaller army defeat the better-equipped English forces.
Who had housecarls william or Harold?
The clue is in the name. Housecarl comes from the Saxon term huscarl or husceorl, meaning the personal bodyguard troops of a Saxon nobleman. So Harold had housecarls and William (as a Norman) did not - but William's ordinary infantry soldiers were far better equipped than the bulk of the Saxon army, who were without armour or helmets.
Who had better defense William or Harold?
They both had good defence- Harold had positioned his army so he was protected. But William had better defence because he had a bigger army, including archers, cavalry, and more trained soldiers.
What is Washington's ragtag band of rebels?
I assume the phrase refers to the Colonial army. As the war progressed the army became better trained and somewhat better equipped, but perhaps "ragtag" still applied. They were certainly a band of rebels.
