Was William the Conqueror's army better equipped?

Probably a thousand or so.

well i dont know google it

The Normans, William the conquerors army, had a feast before the battle.

i wouldn't say either was better equipped but Williams armt was definitely better prepared and organised for wat would happen. i would say that Williams army is because his army had horses,swords and shields but harold had crossbars that took ages to reload he had shields (they had to walk) ...

Because his army was trained better and generally better equipped(They had flintlocks and bayonets and James army had muskets and pikes). Plus William III had the blessing of the pope, William and his army used a smart tactic called the Hollow square that James army couldn't get passed. Lastly James men were out number to 3 to 1. Hope this helped ...

In terms of land forces,China. But in terms of navy, India. Overall China is better equipped than India ...

The British Army during the American Revolution was better trained and better equipped, but the Continental Army's tactics were better suited for the environment, and they were more emotionally committed to the fight. ...

you mean why do you think the colonists were able to win early battles against a more experienced better equipped army? and the answer is (The reason why the colonists would win a more experienced and better equipped army is because that the colonists were fighting in wars for a larger amount of time than the better and more equipped soldiers.) ...

William the Conqueror's army wasn't weak as he managed to take over other lands and they were well-equipped unlike other armies. This put him at advantage making him more powerful and strong. ...

They both had good defence- Harold had positioned his army so he was protected. But William had better defence because he had a bigger army, including archers, cavalry, and more trained soldiers. ...

The army filled various roles in the Roman empire. In a nutshell, they were conquerors, peacekeepers and builders. ...

I assume the phrase refers to the Colonial army. As the war progressed the army became better trained and somewhat better equipped, but perhaps "ragtag" still applied. They were certainly a band of rebels. ...

it doesn't matter how big an army is, it is whether they are well trained and equipped, for example the British Army is't huge but they are well trained and equipped for any situation ...

Yes they have the largest army equipped with modern and sophisticated weaponry. ...

The clue is in the name. Housecarl comes from the Saxon term huscarl or husceorl, meaning the personal bodyguard troops of a Saxon nobleman. So Harold had housecarls and William (as a Norman) did not - but William's ordinary infantry soldiers were far better equipped than the bulk of the Saxon army, who were without armour or helmets. ...

Lee commanded the Army of Northern Virginia during the Civil War, winning a number of victories over the larger and better equipped Army of the Potomac. ...

William won because his army had had a lot of rest that day whereas Harold Godwinson's army had only just fought Harald Hadraada's army. William was also a much better team leader - if you compared him with Harold - as he gave his army what they needed when they needed it eg. rest, food and drink. ...

The current Japanese Land Self-Defense Force is a well equipped but small and inexperienced army. It almost never deploys outside Japan. I believe they are equipped well. ...

stronger fresh and bigger and better army

Yes Because he was a highly skilled soldier, Harold made a lot of mistakes, Harold had bad luck and he had a better army. So yes William was a better leader ...

William the Conquerer's army consisted of 10,000 men

Their well equipped and disciplined army

Mexico is currently around 10-15, because of its growing economy and the fight against drug organizations, which has urged the Mexican Government to make the Army stronger, much better equipped and with much more investment in the Army than before. ...

It may be possible, but a lot of that will depend on the severity of your crime. Your local Army recruiter would be better equipped to answer your questions on this matter. ...

They were able to win the battles because the had a greater knowledge of the land around them. ...