The clue is in the name. Housecarl comes from the Saxon term huscarl or husceorl, meaning the personal bodyguard troops of a Saxon nobleman. So Harold had housecarls and William (as a Norman) did not - but William's ordinary infantry soldiers were far better equipped than the bulk of the Saxon army, who were without armour or helmets.
It was called the Saxon or English army.
The Housecarls, one of Harold's type of soldiers did, but Fyrds, another, didn't.
It is thought that William had 3000 cavalry, 1000 archers and the rest infantry. But Harold had no cavalry, fewer archers thus his army was mostly infantry, as he lost most of his troops on the way from Stamford Bridge. So it was most probably William who had more troops. Hope i was a good help :)
he had around 1500 men i think im not sure == At the Battle of Stamford Bridge, King Harold commanded an army of around 7,000 . At the Battle of Hastings, King Harold's army numbered 7,500, of which 2,000 were is elite Housecarls and 5,500 were fyrd.
Harold William Bennetts died in 1970.
It was called the Saxon or English army.
Harold had the housecarls and they were equipped and paid for by the king also their are the Fryds and they are usually farmers or work in town!
It was a battle between Anglo-saxon soldiers and earls, called Housecarls, led by the English king Harold Godwinson and his two brothers, and the Norman invading army led by William the Conqueror, (Or, as he was referred to at the time, William the Bastard, as he was illegitimate.)
The Housecarls, one of Harold's type of soldiers did, but Fyrds, another, didn't.
It is thought that William had 3000 cavalry, 1000 archers and the rest infantry. But Harold had no cavalry, fewer archers thus his army was mostly infantry, as he lost most of his troops on the way from Stamford Bridge. So it was most probably William who had more troops. Hope i was a good help :)
Well Harold Godwinson had the following weapons: shield wall, housecarls and 2 handed axe that could cut a man in half. But William, Duke of Normandy had: bows, arrows, cavalry and horses. William won, so he had the best weapons.
William (The Conquerer) was not present at the battle of Stamford Bridge. But his adversary Harold Godwinesson was, fighting against his brother (Tostig) and his brother's ally Harald Hardrata. Tostig and Harald lost many men and their lives agaist Harold Godwinesson's well trained heavy infantry (housecarls) and his supporting militia called "the fyrd".
he had around 1500 men i think im not sure == At the Battle of Stamford Bridge, King Harold commanded an army of around 7,000 . At the Battle of Hastings, King Harold's army numbered 7,500, of which 2,000 were is elite Housecarls and 5,500 were fyrd.
No, Harold Godwinson did not use horses in combat during the Battle of Hastings in 1066. His army primarily consisted of infantry, including housecarls (elite soldiers) and the fyrd (militia), who fought on foot. The Normans, led by William the Conqueror, utilized cavalry effectively, which contributed to their victory in the battle.
Harold did not kill William. William killed Harold by shooting an arrow in his eye.
The housecarls i think The housecarls i think
Harold came from England . William came from France